© 2025 International Journal of Mycobacteriology | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow232 Abstract Original Article IntroductIon Survival and treatment outcomes in tuberculosis (TB) patients have improved over the past two decades.[1] However, there is still a high risk of mortality in TB patients due to delayed diagnosis.[2,3] Late TB diagnosis results in delayed treatment, poorer treatment outcomes, increased disease transmission, higher medical costs, and poor prognosis.[4,5] TB is highly prevalent in Afghanistan. [6] Moreover, Afghanistan faces numerous challenges in TB care, including high rates of treatment failure and TB-related mental health symptoms,[7,8] compounded by socioeconomic disparities, limited patient education, and inadequate healthcare infrastructure.[6,9,10] Despite the detrimental effects of diagnostic delay among TB patients, it remains prevalent in many low- and middle‑income countries (LMICs). For instance, a meta-analysis by Fetensa et al. reported a 50% prevalence of diagnostic delay among Ethiopian TB patients.[11] Similarly, another systematic review of 124 articles from TB high-burden countries found that the pooled median durations of patient delay and health system delay were 28 and 14 days, respectively.[12] Other studies in LMICs have also reported a high magnitude of diagnostic delay among TB patients, ranging from 27% to 65%.[13] Background: Diagnostic delay among tuberculosis (TB) patients leads to late anti-TB treatment initiation, which is associated with poor prognosis and increased TB transmission. Despite its recognized negative consequences, diagnostic delay among TB patients is common in developing countries, including Afghanistan, where evidence on its predictors is limited. We aimed to evaluate diagnostic delay and its predictors among newly diagnosed TB patients attending healthcare facilities in Kandahar, Afghanistan. Methods: A multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted in Kandahar between February and May 2025. Newly diagnosed TB patients aged 18 years or older were randomly recruited from the TB care centers of six healthcare facilities. Delays in TB diagnosis encompassed both patient and healthcare system delays. The predictors of diagnostic delay were identified using a multivariable logistic regression model. Results: Patient and health system delays were noted in 44% and 59.4% of cases, respectively. Patients’ low education level, extrapulmonary TB, longer distance to healthcare facility, and positive history of self‑medication were significant predictors of diagnostic delays. Conclusion: Despite the well‑established benefits of early TB diagnosis, this study revealed that delay in TB diagnosis is still a public health challenge in Kandahar province. Late presentation for TB care was a result of factors that relate to the patient’s education, TB type, distance to healthcare facility, and history of self-medication. Therefore, focusing extra attention on these factors could potentially reduce diagnostic delays among TB patients in Afghanistan. Keywords: Afghanistan, delays, diagnosis, predictors, tuberculosis Access this article online Quick Response Code: Website: https://journals.lww.com/IJMY DOI: 10.4103/ijmy.ijmy_91_25 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‑NonCommercial‑ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non‑commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. For reprints contact: WKHLRPMedknow_reprints@wolterskluwer.com Diagnostic Delay and its Predictors among Tuberculosis Patients in Kandahar, Afghanistan: A Cross‑sectional Analytical Study Hazratullah Bariz1, Muhammad Haroon Stanikzai1, Ghulam Mohayuddin Mudaser2, Khalid Ahmad Stanikzai3, Omid Dadras4 Departments of 1Public Health and 2Para‑Clinic, Faculty of Medicine, Kandahar University, 3Department of Clinic, Faculty of Medicine, Malalay Institute of Higher Education, Kandahar, Afghanistan, 4Research Centre for Child Psychiatry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland Submitted: 01-May-2025 Revised: 22-Jul-2025 Accepted: 23-Aug-2025 Published: 15-Sep-2025 How to cite this article: Bariz H, Stanikzai MH, Mudaser GM, Stanikzai KA, Dadras O. Diagnostic delay and its predictors among tuberculosis patients in Kandahar, Afghanistan: A cross-sectional analytical study. Int J Mycobacteriol 2025;14:232-8. Address for correspondence: Dr. Muhammad Haroon Stanikzai, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Kandahar University, District #10, 3801, Kandahar, Afghanistan. E‑mail: haroonstanikzai1@gmail.com ORCID: Muhammad Haroon Stanikzai: https://orcid.org/0000‑0003‑2757‑1965 Bariz, et al.: Diagnostic delay and its predictors among TB patients in Kandahar, Afghanistan International Journal of Mycobacteriology ¦ Volume 14 ¦ Issue 3 ¦ July-September 2025 233 Research has attributed several factors to the heightened risk of diagnostic delay among TB patients in LMICs. For example, a mixed-methods systematic review found that poor TB knowledge, TB stigma, financial difficulties, poor access to healthcare, and lack of resources at healthcare facilities were associated with diagnostic delays among TB patients in high-burden countries.[12] Other factors such as female sex, rural residence, illiteracy, unemployment, and long distance to healthcare facilities have been linked with diagnostic delay among TB patients in the pertinent literature.[13] Meanwhile, diagnostic delays among TB patients can be considerably reduced.[14,15] Several interventions have been implemented to reduce diagnostic delays among TB patients, including active case finding, rapid testing, patient benefit schemes, behavior change campaigns, health education, private-sector interventions, and capacity-building and skill development of healthcare professionals.[14,16] These interventions have shown varying influences across different settings.[14] In Afghanistan, the context of diagnostic delay among TB patients has been underexplored,[17] particularly in the southern part of the country. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate diagnostic delays and their predictors among TB patients in Kandahar, Afghanistan. These findings will provide valuable information for evidence-based decision-making in TB control at the provincial and national levels. Methods Ethical Consideration Ethical clearance for this study was obtained from the Research and Ethics Committee at the Faculty of Medicine, Kandahar University (Letter No. 115, dated January 10, 2025). The study strictly adhered to the ethical guidelines outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. Types of sampling and reasons for selection We calculated our sample size using the formula commonly applied in cross-sectional studies for estimating proportions, based on a 50% prevalence rate of diagnostic delay (maximum estimate), a 95% confidence level, and a Z = 1.96. After adding a 10% nonresponse rate, a sample size of 422 TB patients was deemed adequate. Data from 441 patients were included in the analysis. We allocated the sample size proportionally to the TB patient load at each facility over the past 3 months. Study design and settings This cross-sect ional s tudy was conducted f rom February to May 2025 in six public healthcare facilities in Kandahar, Afghanistan: Kandahar TB Center, Mirwais Regional Hospital (MRH), Spin Boldak District Hospital, Allama Rashad Comprehensive Healthcare Facility (CHC), Zahari District CHC, and Panjwai District CHC. The healthcare facilities are being equipped to provide basic diagnostic and curative services to TB patients. Inclusion criteria Our study population consisted of TB patients attending the TB care centers of the abovementioned healthcare facilities. Based on our inclusion criteria, we only recruited newly diagnosed TB patients aged 18 years and above. Exclusion criteria Severely ill and nonconsenting TB patients were excluded from the study. One hundred and ten patients were recruited from MRH, followed by the Kandahar TB Center (65), Spin Boldak District Hospital (52), Allama Rashad CHC (43), Zahari District CHC (39), and Panjwai District CHC (39). The patients were randomly recruited at each healthcare facility using the lottery method. Study variables The outcome variable was diagnostic delay among TB patients, which consisted of patient delay, health system delay, and total delay. We assumed the patient was delayed if they visited a professional health provider more than 30 days after the onset of TB symptoms.[18,19] Health system delay was confirmed if a TB diagnosis was confirmed more than 4 days after the patient presented to a professional health provider.[18,19] Total delay was equal to the sum of patient and health system delays. We recorded delay periods in days. The independent variables examined were sociodemographic characteristics and clinical factors. The sociodemographic factors included age, sex, education level, residential area (urban vs. rural), marital status, employment status, household size, monthly income, and distance to healthcare facility. Clinical variables comprised TB type, family history of TB, knowledge of TB, self-perceived severity, self-medication, current smoking, TB-related stigma, and history of depression symptoms were also included as independent factors of interest. Depression symptoms were assessed by the patient’s self-reported dichotomized questions with a yes or no response to “Did you experience any depression symptoms during disease?” Data collection We used a paper-based, structured, and pretested questionnaire to collect data. A 30-min face-to-face interview was conducted with newly diagnosed TB patients at their exit in a private room. Female interviewers interviewed female patients. We checked all questionnaires for completeness, consistency, and accuracy. Patient consent statement We obtained verbal informed consent from all participants in the study. Statistical analysis To assess the distribution of sociodemographic characteristics and clinical factors of patients, descriptive statistics were provided using frequency and percentage. To examine the likelihood of patient and health system delays across the Bariz, et al.: Diagnostic delay and its predictors among TB patients in Kandahar, Afghanistan International Journal of Mycobacteriology ¦ Volume 14 ¦ Issue 3 ¦ July-September 2025234 categories of explanatory variables, bivariate and multivariable binary logistic regression models were used. To determine the inclusion of explanatory variables in the multivariable analysis, we included the explanatory variable in the multivariable regression analysis if it had P < 0.25 for all categories of the explanatory variable from the bivariate model. All data analyses were performed using STATA version 17 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, Texas, USA.). results Demographic characteristics In total, we enrolled 441 newly diagnosed TB patients in the study. Among them, 148 (33.6%) were aged >50 years, more than half (53.7%) were females, two-thirds (63.9%) had no formal education, 272 (61.7%) were urban residents, and the majority (70.5%) were married. Moreover, patients were most likely to live in households with more than five members (83.2%) and had to travel more than 1 h to reach the nearest health facility (54.6%). Regarding income, 239 (54.2%) had a monthly household income exceeding 10,000 Afghanis [Table 1]. Clinical characteristics Of all the patients, 287 (65.1%) had pulmonary TB, one-third (33.1%) had a family history of TB, and 283 (64.2%) had poor knowledge of TB. The majority of patients had TB-related stigma (67.6%) and depression symptoms (89.1%). About half of the patients (49.7%) reported self-medication before a diagnosis was made. Details on the first health facility contacted by patients are presented in Table 2. Prevalence of patient, health system, and diagnostic delays among tuberculosis patients Figure 1 shows that the median (mean) patient delay was 30.1 (68.9) days, with 44% of patients experiencing prolonged patient delay. Moreover, the median (mean) health system delay was 10.3 (27.4) days, with 59.4% of patients experiencing prolonged health system delay [Figure 1]. Factors associated with patient delay among tuberculosis patients The likelihood of patient delay was higher in patients with no formal education (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 1.60, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02–2.49), in extrapulmonary TB patients (AOR: 1.82, 95% CI: 1.19–2.77), patients with longer distance to the nearest health facility (AOR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.05–2.33), and those with a history of self-medication (AOR: 2.27, 95% CI: 1.51–3.40) [Table 3]. Factors associated with health system delay among tuberculosis patients Similarly, the patient’s education level, type of TB, time to reach the nearest health facility, and history of self-medication were predictors of health system delay. Table 1: Sociodemographic characteristics of the study participants (n=441) Variables Frequency, n (%) Age 18–20 38 (8.6) 21–30 110 (24.9) 31–40 78 (17.7) 41–50 67 (15.2) >50 148 (33.6) Sex Male 204 (46.3) Female 237 (53.7) Residence Urban 169 (38.3) Rural 272 (61.7) Marital status Single 94 (21.3) Married 311 (70.5) Widowed/divorced 36 (8.2) Educational status No formal education 282 (63.9) Religious 72 (16.3) Primary 50 (11.3) Secondary 9 (2.0) High school graduate 20 (4.5) Higher studies 8 (1.8) Employment status Public employed 41 (9.3) Private employed 37 (8.4) Homemaker 182 (41.3) Unemployed 181 (41.0) Household members 2–5 74 (16.8) >5 367 (83.2) Distance to a health facility (h) ≤1 200 (45.4) >1 241 (54.6) Monthly household income (Afghanis) 5000–10,000 202 (45.8) >10,000 239 (54.2)Figure 1: Prevalence of patient, health system, and total delays Bariz, et al.: Diagnostic delay and its predictors among TB patients in Kandahar, Afghanistan International Journal of Mycobacteriology ¦ Volume 14 ¦ Issue 3 ¦ July-September 2025 235 The crude and AOR for health system delay are presented in Table 4. dIscussIon The aim of this was to evaluate diagnostic delay and its predictors among TB patients in Kandahar, Afghanistan. We found that 44% and 59.4% of patients experienced prolonged delays within the patient and health system, respectively. In addition, we found that patients’ low education level, longer distance to health facilities, extrapulmonary TB, and self‑medication were significantly associated with diagnostic delay among TB patients. We found that 44% of participants had prolonged patient delay, with a median (mean) of 30.1 (68.9) days. This finding aligns with earlier studies conducted in India (44.6%)[15] and southern Ethiopia (median: 30 days).[20] However, our finding is higher than studies conducted in Ethiopia (median: 20–24 days)[21,22] and China (median: 16.8 days).[23] No recent study has assessed diagnostic delay among TB patients in Afghanistan. Nonetheless, the previous studies have shown poor TB knowledge and high TB-related stigma among Afghan TB patients.[7,24] These findings, together, underscore a critical need for integrated policy action, embedding TB awareness into the community’s literacy and vocational programs, and mobilizing community health workers in active TB case finding. We also observed an alarming magnitude (59.4%) of health system delay in the current study. The previous studies have also documented prolonged health system delays among TB patients in LMICs.[14,25,26] Limited resources, a shortage of the health workforce, and poor capacity among healthcare professionals are some of the reasons linked to health system delays in LMICs.[14] Earlier studies have shown that TB care faces significant challenges in Afghanistan, particularly in the postconflict scenario.[6,8,27] Considering the negative health consequences and higher medical and nonmedical costs associated with late TB diagnosis, there is an urgent need for resource allocation, the provision of rapid diagnostic tools, and the capacity-building and skill development of healthcare professionals in Afghanistan. Education has long been considered a significant predictor of optimal healthcare utilization. We also observed that patients with no formal education encountered substantial delays in TB diagnosis. This finding is in agreement with studies conducted in Indonesia[28] and Ethiopia.[22] Previous studies in Afghanistan have also revealed high prevalence of TB-related stigma, depression symptoms, and nonadherence to anti-TB medications among patients with no formal education.[8,9] Taking these findings together, TB programs and policies should prioritize individuals with limited education in Afghanistan. We found that TB patients who had to travel more than 1 h to reach the nearest health facility were more likely to experience both patient and health system delays than their counterparts. Studies in LMICs have revealed that longer distance to healthcare facilities contributes to late diagnosis, nonadherence to medication, higher medical and nonmedical costs, and poor prognosis.[29] In Afghanistan, earlier research has shown that a longer distance is a contributing factor to poor healthcare utilization.[30,31] Therefore, policymakers should prioritize expanding access to decentralized TB diagnostic and treatment services in remote areas to reduce both patient and health system delays. Extrapulmonary TB has been identified as a risk factor for delayed TB diagnosis.[32,33] Similarly, we found that the odds of patient and health system delays were greater in patients diagnosed with extrapulmonary TB compared to those diagnosed with pulmonary TB. This finding is echoed in earlier studies conducted in LMICs.[19,22,34] No study has investigated diagnostic delay among extrapulmonary TB patients in Afghanistan. In addition, there is a limited focus on extrapulmonary TB in the Afghan health system.[6] These findings call for resource allocation and the capacity building of Afghan healthcare professionals in the diagnosis of extrapulmonary TB. Finally, this study noted that self-medication is strongly associated with both patient and health system delays in Table 2: Clinical and other related characteristics (n=441) Variables Frequency, n (%) Type of TB Pulmonary TB 287 (65.1) Extrapulmonary TB 154 (34.9) Self-perceived severity Mild 55 (12.5) Moderate 145 (32.9) Severe 241 (54.6) TB awareness Yes 158 (35.8) No 283 (64.2) Family history of TB Yes 146 (33.1) No 295 (66.9) TB-related stigma Yes 298 (67.6) No 143 (32.4) Depression symptoms Yes 393 (89.1) No 48 (10.9) Currently smoking Yes 62 (14.1) No 379 (85.9) Type of health facility first contacted Public hospital/clinic 164 (37.2) Private hospital/clinic 114 (25.8) Pharmacy 163 (41.0) Self-medication Yes 219 (49.7) No 222 (50.3) TB: Tuberculosis Bariz, et al.: Diagnostic delay and its predictors among TB patients in Kandahar, Afghanistan International Journal of Mycobacteriology ¦ Volume 14 ¦ Issue 3 ¦ July-September 2025236 TB patients. Self‑medication is known to be a significant barrier to timely TB diagnosis and results in various adverse consequences.[35] It also contributes to prediagnosis costs linked with TB.[36,37] Studies have also shown that prediagnosis costs comprise a significant portion of the total medical and nonmedical expenses associated with TB.[38] No study has reported on self-medication among Afghan TB patients. Therefore, the magnitude and predictors of self-medication among Afghan TB patients warrant further investigation. conclusIon Diagnostic delay among TB patients is an increasingly recognized basis for disease transmission and poor prognosis. About 44% and 59.4% of TB patients in our cohort had prolonged patient delay and health system delay, respectively. In addition, we found that patients’ low education level, longer distance to the nearest health facility, extrapulmonary TB, and self‑medication were significantly associated with diagnostic delay among TB patients. Therefore, focusing extra attention on these factors could potentially reduce diagnostic delays among TB patients in Afghanistan. Outcomes of the study About 44% and 59.4% of patients had prolonged patient delay and health system delay, respectively. Low education level, extrapulmonary TB, longer distance, and self-medication predicted diagnostic delay among TB patients. The high magnitude of diagnostic delays in the study area is a cause for concern and action. Rationale of the study No previous study has assessed diagnostic delay among TB patients in Southern Afghanistan. Therefore, this study aimed Table 3: Logistic regression analysis on results of patient delay; crude and adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence interval Variables Categories Patient delay COR (95% CI) P AOR (95% CI) P Yes No Age 18–40 101 125 Reference 0.762 - - >40 93 122 0.93 (0.64−1.37) Sex Male 80 124 Reference 0.061 Reference 0.846 Female 114 123 1.43 (0.98−2.09) 1.04 (0.68−1.59) Residence Rural 120 152 Reference 0.946 - - Urban 74 95 0.98 (0.67−1.45) Marital status Currently married 138 173 Reference 0.80 - - Currently unmarried 56 74 0.94 (0.62−1.43) Education status Educated 55 104 Reference 0.003 Reference 0.038 Uneducated 139 143 1.83 (1.23−2.74) 1.60 (1.02−2.49) Employment Employed 35 43 Reference 0.86 − − Unemployed 159 204 0.95 (0.58−1.56) Household size 2–5 35 43 Reference 0.86 − − >5 159 204 0.95 (0.58−1.56) Distance to healthcare facility (h) ≤1 76 124 Reference 0.021 Reference 0.026 >1 118 123 1.56 (1.06−2.29) 1.56 (1.05−2.33) Monthly income 5000–10,000 85 117 Reference 0.45 − − >10,000 109 130 0.86 (0.59−1.26) Type of TB Pulmonary 114 173 Reference 0.014 Reference 0.005 Extrapulmonary 80 74 1.64 (1.10−2.43) 1.82 (1.19−2.77) Self-perceived disease severity Not severe 22 33 Reference 0.524 - - Severe 172 214 1.20 (0.67−2.14) TB awareness No 126 157 Reference 0.763 - - Yes 68 90 0.94 (0.63−1.39) Family history of TB No 132 163 Reference 0.650 - - Yes 62 84 0.91 (0.61−1.36) TB-related stigma No 65 78 Reference 0.668 - - Yes 129 169 0.91 (0.61−1.36) Depression symptoms No 18 30 Reference 0.337 - - Yes 176 217 1.35 (0.72−2.50) Currently smoking No 169 210 Reference 0.530 - - Yes 25 37 0.84 (0.48−1.45) Self-medication No 75 147 Reference <0.001 Reference <0.001 Yes 119 147 2.33 (1.58−3.42) 2.27 (1.51−3.40) TB: Tuberculosis, COR: Crude odds ratio, AOR: Adjusted odds ratio, CI: Confidence interval Bariz, et al.: Diagnostic delay and its predictors among TB patients in Kandahar, Afghanistan International Journal of Mycobacteriology ¦ Volume 14 ¦ Issue 3 ¦ July-September 2025 237 to evaluate diagnostic delays and their predictors among TB patients in Kandahar, Afghanistan. These findings will provide valuable information for evidence-based decision-making in TB control at the provincial and national levels. Limitations of study Although this study has provided important information about diagnostic delay among TB patients in Afghanistan, it has its limitations. First, the cross-sectional nature of the study makes it difficult to infer the temporal relationship between predictors and diagnostic delay among TB patients. Second, data on patient and health system delays were self-reported and are prone to information and recall biases. Third, the cutoff point for assessing diagnostic delay differs across studies; therefore, comparing diagnostic delays and their predictors considering various cutoff points seems formidable. Finally, our evaluation of predictors for diagnostic delay among TB patients was restricted to the information collected by the current study. Therefore, future studies include other important determinants, such as social and community support systems, media access, and doctor–patient communication, in their analyses. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest. references 1. Yang H, Ruan X, Li W, Xiong J, Zheng Y. Global, regional, and national burden of tuberculosis and attributable risk factors for 204 countries and territories, 1990-2021: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of diseases 2021 study. BMC Public Health Table 4: Logistic regression analysis on results of health system delay; crude and adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence interval Variables Categories Health system delay COR (95% CI) P AOR (95% CI) P Yes No Age 18–40 140 86 Reference 0.266 - - >40 122 93 0.80 (0.55−1.17) Sex Male 114 90 Reference 0.162 Reference 0.960 Female 148 89 1.31 (0.89−1.92) 0.96 (0.62−1.46) Residence Rural 151 121 Reference 0.035 Reference 0.850 Urban 111 58 1.53 (1.03−2.28) 1.03 (0.67−1.60) Marital status Currently married 182 129 Reference 0.556 - - Currently unmarried 80 50 1.13 (0.74−1.72) Education status Educated 82 77 Reference 0.012 Reference 0.019 Uneducated 180 102 1.65 (1.11−2.45) 1.70 (1.09−2.64) Employment Employed 45 33 Reference 0.733 - - Unemployed 217 146 1.09 (0.66−1.78) Household size 2–5 45 29 Reference 0.788 - - >5 217 150 1.07 (0.64−1.78) Distance to healthcare facility (h) ≤1 112 88 Reference 0.184 Reference 0.022 >1 150 91 1.29 (0.88−1.89) 1.71 (1.08−2.72) Monthly income 5000–10,000 120 82 Reference 0.99 - - >10,000 142 97 1.00 (0.68−1.46) Type of TB Pulmonary 153 134 Reference <0.001 Reference <0.001 Extrapulmonary 109 45 2.12 (1.39−3.22) 2.23 (1.44−3.44) Self-perceived disease severity Not severe 33 22 Reference 0.924 - - Severe 229 157 0.97 (0.54−2.73) TB awareness No 171 112 Reference 0.562 - - Yes 91 67 0.89 (0.59−1.32) Family history of TB No 177 118 Reference 0.720 - - Yes 85 61 0.92 (0.62−1.39) TB-related stigma No 83 60 Reference 0.685 - - Yes 179 119 0.91 (0.61−1.36) Depression symptoms No 28 20 Reference 0.872 - - Yes 234 159 1.05 (0.57−1.93) Currently smoking No 230 149 Reference 0.277 - - Yes 32 30 0.69 (0.40−1.18) Self-medication No 120 102 Reference 0.021 Reference 0.015 Yes 142 77 1.56 (1.06−2.29) 1.66 (1.10−2.51) TB: Tuberculosis, COR: Crude odds ratio, AOR: Adjusted odds ratio, CI: Confidence interval Bariz, et al.: Diagnostic delay and its predictors among TB patients in Kandahar, Afghanistan International Journal of Mycobacteriology ¦ Volume 14 ¦ Issue 3 ¦ July-September 2025238 2024;24:3111. 2. Sebastian NM, Haveri SP, Nath AS. Delay in diagnosis of tuberculosis and related factors from a district in Kerala, India. Indian J Tuberc 2021;68:59-64. 3. Agarwal S, Chaurasia Z, Malik DK, Gupta R, Singh C, Jain S. The real burden of tuberculosis: Hidden cases diagnosed on autopsy at a tertiary care center of India. Int J Mycobacteriol 2022;11:47-50. 4. Liu JJ, Feng YP, Liu ZD, Guo J. Impact of delayed diagnosis and treatment on tuberculosis infection within families: A case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2024;103:e37406. 5. Abderrahim S, Taright S. Risk factors for pulmonary tuberculosis in an urban area of Algeria. Int J Mycobacteriol 2025;14:48-55. 6. Stanikzai MH, Hashim-Wafa M. Tuberculosis (TB) care challenges in post‑conflict settings: The case of Afghanistan. Indian J Tuberc 2022;69:383-4. 7. Stanikzai MH, Rahimy N, Baray AH, Anwary Z, Ahmad M, Sayam H. High stigma prevalence and associated factors among TB patients in Southern Afghanistan: A multi-center cross-sectional study. Indian J Tuberc 2024;71 Suppl 2:S203-7. 8. Stanikzai MH, Wafa MH, Baray AH, Rahimi AF, Sayam H. Anti-TB treatment non-adherence predictors: A multi-center cross-sectional study in Kandahar, Afghanistan. Indian J Tuberc 2024. doi: 10.1016/j. ijtb.2024.05.005. 9. Stanikzai MH, Ishaq N, Zafar MN, Baray AH, Anwary Z, Ahmad M, et al. Depression symptoms among Afghan TB patients: A multi-center study. Indian J Tuberc 2024;71 Suppl 2:S264-8. 10. Hamim A, Seddiq MK, Sayedi SM, Rashid MK, Qader GQ, Manzoor L, et al. The contribution of private health facilities to the urban tuberculosis program of Afghanistan. Indian J Tuberc 2023;70:8-11. 11. Fetensa G, Wirtu D, Etana B, Wakuma B, Tolossa T, Gugsa J, et al. Tuberculosis treatment delay and contributing factors within tuberculosis patients in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Heliyon 2024;10:e28699. 12. Teo AK, Singh SR, Prem K, Hsu LY, Yi S. Duration and determinants of delayed tuberculosis diagnosis and treatment in high-burden countries: A mixed-methods systematic review and meta-analysis. Respir Res 2021;22:251. 13. Getiye A, Zakaria HF, Deressa A, Mamo G, Gamachu M, Birhanu A, et al. Magnitude and factors associated with delay in treatment-seeking among new pulmonary tuberculosis patients in public health facilities in Habro district, Eastern Ethiopia. Health Serv Insights 2024;17:11786329241232532. 14. Shah HD, Nazli Khatib M, Syed ZQ, Gaidhane AM, Yasobant S, Narkhede K, et al. Gaps and interventions across the diagnostic care cascade of TB patients at the level of patient, community and health system: A qualitative review of the literature. Trop Med Infect Dis 2022;7:136. 15. Shetty SM, D. Shivarama P, Shamanewadi AN, Venkatesh R, Pattapally TT, Praveen S, et al. Diagnostic delay, expenditure pattern and treatment outcome of extra-pulmonary TB patients of Bangalore Urban District - A mixed method study. Indian J Tuberc 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.ijtb.2024.12.002. 16. Liu Q, Chen Q, Guo Y, Yu S, Rui J, Li K, et al. Feasibility of eliminating tuberculosis by shortening the diagnostic delay: A retrospective analysis and modelling study in China during the pre-COVID-19 era. Heliyon 2024;10:e35016. 17. Stanikzai MH, Wafa MH, Rahimi BA, Sayam H. Conducting health research in the current afghan society: Challenges, opportunities, and recommendations. Risk Manag Healthc Policy 2023;16:2479-83. 18. Wondawek TM, Ali MM. Delay in treatment seeking and associated factors among suspected pulmonary tuberculosis patients in public health facilities of Adama town, eastern Ethiopia. BMC Public Health 2019;19:1527. 19. Olayanju O, Otaigbe I, Sodeinde K, Abiodun O, Adebiyi A. Factors associated with delay of patients with cough to tuberculosis treatment centres in selected DOTS in South-West Nigeria. Indian J Tuberc 2025;72:25-31. 20. Arja A, Godana W, Hassen H, Bogale B. Patient delay and associated factors among tuberculosis patients in Gamo zone public health facilities, Southern Ethiopia: An institution-based cross-sectional study. PLoS One 2021;16:e0255327. 21. Wako WG, Wasie A, Wayessa Z, Fikrie A. Determinants of health system diagnostic delay of pulmonary tuberculosis in Gurage and Siltie zones, South Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2021;11:e047986. 22. Alene M, Assemie MA, Yismaw L, Gedif G, Ketema DB, Gietaneh W, et al. Patient delay in the diagnosis of tuberculosis in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis 2020;20:797. 23. Jia Y, Jiang W, Xiao X, Lou Z, Tang S, Chen J, et al. Patient delay, diagnosis delay, and treatment outcomes among migrant patients with tuberculosis in Shanghai, China, 2018-2020: A mixed-methods study. BMJ Open 2024;14:e082430. 24. Essar MY, Rezayee KJ, Ahmad S, Kamal MA, Nasery R, Danishmand TJ, et al. Knowledge, attitude, and practices toward tuberculosis among hospital outpatients in Kabul, Afghanistan. Front Public Health 2022;10:933005. 25. Phutane MS, Sawant PA, Randive AP, Hulsurkar YP, Mahajan US, Kudale AM. Sociocultural aspects of delays in diagnosis among tuberculosis-diabetes comorbid patients in Satara, India: Its implications for the implementation of the national framework for joint tuberculosis-diabetes collaborative activities. Indian J Tuberc 2024;71:250-61. 26. Takarinda KC, Harries AD, Nyathi B, Ngwenya M, Mutasa-Apollo T, Sandy C. Tuberculosis treatment delays and associated factors within the Zimbabwe national tuberculosis programme. BMC Public Health 2015;15:29. 27. Stanikzai MH, Shanawa S, Karimkhil AT, Dadras O. Medical education in afghanistan: challenges and policy implications. Adv Med Educ Pract 2025;16:477-82. 28. Lestari BW, McAllister S, Hadisoemarto PF, Afifah N, Jani ID, Murray M, et al. Patient pathways and delays to diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis in an urban setting in Indonesia. Lancet Reg Health West Pac 2020;5:100059. 29. Shinde AM. Socio-demographic factors and adherence of newly diagnosed pulmonary tuberculosis patients to the newly introduced daily regimen: A hospital survey based follow up study. Indian J Tuberc 2024;71 Suppl 2:S250-7. 30. Malik MA, Sinha R, Priya A, Rahman MH. Barriers to healthcare utilization among married women in Afghanistan: The role of asset ownership and women’s autonomy. BMC Public Health 2024;24:613. 31. Satarzadeh L, Tabatabaee SS, Ghavami V, Moghri J. Understanding patient perceptions of access to healthcare centers in one of the major cities of Afghanistan. Sci Rep 2025;15:13500. 32. Pathak MR, Pandya KJ, Ramwani SP, Pingalsur A, Karatela S, Sisodia JA, et al. Navigating extrapulmonary tuberculosis: A case series from a tertiary care facility highlighting rare presentations, diagnostic challenges, drug resistance, and therapeutic complexities. Int J Mycobacteriol 2024;13:369-78. 33. Sivaratnam L, Nawi AM, Abdul Manaf MR. An evidence‑based clinical pathway for the diagnosis of tuberculous lymphadenitis: A systematic review. Int J Mycobacteriol 2020;9:107-15. 34. Rusmawardiana R, Nursyarifah N, Argentina F, Pamudji R. Dermoscopy and clinicopathology features in diagnosing paucibacillary leprosy: Case series. Int J Mycobacteriol 2022;11:332-6. 35. Alexander V, Rathinam JJ, George JT, Paul JS. Letter to the editor regarding the case report: Unregulated medication use and complications: Is self-medication a common problem with anti-tuberculous therapy (ATT)? Role for patient education. BMC Infect Dis 2024;24:283. 36. Rahimi BA, Rahimy N, Mukaka M, Ahmadi Q, Hayat MS, Wasiq AW. Determinants of treatment failure among tuberculosis patients in Kandahar City, Afghanistan: A 5-year retrospective cohort study. Int J Mycobacteriol 2019;8:359-65. 37. Daka S, Matsuoka Y, Ota M, Hirao S, Phiri A. Turnaround times of the sputum sample courier system at tuberculosis treatment centers in Lusaka, Zambia, 2021. Int J Mycobacteriol 2022;11:103‑7. 38. Mohammed H, Oljira L, Roba KT, Ngadaya E, Tesfaye D, Manyazewal T, et al. Impact of early chest radiography on delay in pulmonary tuberculosis case notification in Ethiopia. Int J Mycobacteriol 2021;10:364-72.