COMPOSITE REPAIR : ON THE FATIGUE STRENGTH OF UNIVERSAL ADHESIVES
Tulkki, Oskari (2021-06-02)
COMPOSITE REPAIR : ON THE FATIGUE STRENGTH OF UNIVERSAL ADHESIVES
(02.06.2021)
Julkaisu on tekijänoikeussäännösten alainen. Teosta voi lukea ja tulostaa henkilökohtaista käyttöä varten. Käyttö kaupallisiin tarkoituksiin on kielletty.
suljettu
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2021060434166
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2021060434166
Tiivistelmä
Objectives: The repair of defective restorations has been a well-accepted treatment modality. Recently, universal, one-bottle adhesives were introduced, to ensure a fast and reliable bonding procedure. This study evaluated the strength and fatigue resistance of the bonded interfaces between aged and new composite as a function of adhesive resin treatment.
Methods: Composite specimens (2x2x12mm) were prepared (Filtek Supreme XTE, 3M, ESPE) for four point-bending and aged in water (37 °C/ 180 days). The twin bonded interface (TBI) specimens between the aged and new composite resin ((Filtek Supreme XTE) were prepared using different adhesives: 1) iBond Universal (IB), Heraus Kulzer, (2)Futurabond U (FBM+), Voco, (3)Scothbond Universal (SU), 4) Scotchbond Universal Plus (SU+) 3M-ESPE 4) Clearfil Universal Bond Quick (CFU), Kuraray.5)Clearfil repair (CFR), Kuraray. Unrepaired aged samples (AC) as well as fresh samples (FC) served as controls. The specimens were subjected to either quasi-static (n=12) or cyclic (n=25/group) four-point flexure testing using a stress ratio of 0.1 and frequency of 4Hz to failure in hydrated conditions (1.2 million cycles). Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA for quasi-static and Wilcoxon Rank Sum test for fatigue data (α=0.05).
Results: Under quasi-static loading, flexural strength of the fresh (120 ±10MPa) and aged (114±16MPa) controls were significantly higher than other groups (p<0.05). The fatigue resistance of the fresh or unrepaired specimens were significantly higher than repaired ones. No significant differences occurred between bonding protocols with the exception of CFU, which produced significantly lower values.
Conclusions: The fatigue resistance of the repaired interfaces were adhesive protocol dependent and showed lower fatigue resistance than the controls.
Methods: Composite specimens (2x2x12mm) were prepared (Filtek Supreme XTE, 3M, ESPE) for four point-bending and aged in water (37 °C/ 180 days). The twin bonded interface (TBI) specimens between the aged and new composite resin ((Filtek Supreme XTE) were prepared using different adhesives: 1) iBond Universal (IB), Heraus Kulzer, (2)Futurabond U (FBM+), Voco, (3)Scothbond Universal (SU), 4) Scotchbond Universal Plus (SU+) 3M-ESPE 4) Clearfil Universal Bond Quick (CFU), Kuraray.5)Clearfil repair (CFR), Kuraray. Unrepaired aged samples (AC) as well as fresh samples (FC) served as controls. The specimens were subjected to either quasi-static (n=12) or cyclic (n=25/group) four-point flexure testing using a stress ratio of 0.1 and frequency of 4Hz to failure in hydrated conditions (1.2 million cycles). Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA for quasi-static and Wilcoxon Rank Sum test for fatigue data (α=0.05).
Results: Under quasi-static loading, flexural strength of the fresh (120 ±10MPa) and aged (114±16MPa) controls were significantly higher than other groups (p<0.05). The fatigue resistance of the fresh or unrepaired specimens were significantly higher than repaired ones. No significant differences occurred between bonding protocols with the exception of CFU, which produced significantly lower values.
Conclusions: The fatigue resistance of the repaired interfaces were adhesive protocol dependent and showed lower fatigue resistance than the controls.