“If they were my son I’d have to apologize” : An Examination of Masculinity in Terrace House: Opening New Doors
Selonen, Lauri (2022-03-09)
“If they were my son I’d have to apologize” : An Examination of Masculinity in Terrace House: Opening New Doors
Selonen, Lauri
(09.03.2022)
Julkaisu on tekijänoikeussäännösten alainen. Teosta voi lukea ja tulostaa henkilökohtaista käyttöä varten. Käyttö kaupallisiin tarkoituksiin on kielletty.
avoin
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2022042630596
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2022042630596
Tiivistelmä
This thesis combines Japan studies, reality television studies and gender studies in an attempt to map
how masculinity is performed and represented in the reality television show Terrace House: Opening
New Doors. Through a combination of qualitative close reading of the show and a review of prior
theories of Japanese masculinity, this thesis seeks to produce a stance on whether the trajectories of
hegemonic masculinity have been upset in the Japanese society and whether a shift to a more inclusive
view of masculinity as suggested by Eric Anderson could be applied to the Japanese setting. The
mundane, upper middle-class projective drama of the show provides us with a convenient mirror of
assessing what kinds of practices of masculinity are acceptable in a decisively uncontroversial setting
and thus perhaps in the society more widely. This thesis contends that in keeping with trends already
identified in western settings, also the Japanese normative gender practice has had its boundaries
moved and made accessible to more varied iterations of masculinity. It also contends that while
successful masculinity has thus become societally less important, it has also become more difficult to
achieve, suggesting that there exist distinct categories of ‘acceptable’ and ‘successful’ masculinity.
how masculinity is performed and represented in the reality television show Terrace House: Opening
New Doors. Through a combination of qualitative close reading of the show and a review of prior
theories of Japanese masculinity, this thesis seeks to produce a stance on whether the trajectories of
hegemonic masculinity have been upset in the Japanese society and whether a shift to a more inclusive
view of masculinity as suggested by Eric Anderson could be applied to the Japanese setting. The
mundane, upper middle-class projective drama of the show provides us with a convenient mirror of
assessing what kinds of practices of masculinity are acceptable in a decisively uncontroversial setting
and thus perhaps in the society more widely. This thesis contends that in keeping with trends already
identified in western settings, also the Japanese normative gender practice has had its boundaries
moved and made accessible to more varied iterations of masculinity. It also contends that while
successful masculinity has thus become societally less important, it has also become more difficult to
achieve, suggesting that there exist distinct categories of ‘acceptable’ and ‘successful’ masculinity.