Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä aineisto 
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Immediate repair bond strength of fiber-reinforced composite after saliva or water contamination

Flett Andrew; Vallittu Pekka K.; Bijelic-Donova Jasmina; Lassila Lippo V.J.

Immediate repair bond strength of fiber-reinforced composite after saliva or water contamination

Flett Andrew
Vallittu Pekka K.
Bijelic-Donova Jasmina
Lassila Lippo V.J.
Katso/Avaa
Publisher's version (206.1Kb)
Lataukset: 

Quintessence Publishing Co., Ltd
doi:10.3290/j.jad.a40515
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2021042719655
Tiivistelmä

Purpose: This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the shear bond strength
(SBS) of particulate filler composite (PFC) to saliva- or
water-contaminated fiber-reinforced composite (FRC).
Materials and
Methods: One type of FRC substrate with semi-interpenetrating polymer
matrix (semi-IPN) (everStick C&B) was used in this investigation. A
microhybrid PFC (Filtek Z250) substrate served as control. Freshly cured
PFC and FRC substrates were first subjected to different contamination
and surface cleaning treatments, then the microhybrid PFC restorative
material (Filtek Z250) was built up on the substrates in 2-mm increments
and light cured. Uncontaminated and saliva- or water-contaminated
substrate surfaces were either left untreated or were cleaned via
phosphoric acid etching or water spray accompanied with or without
adhesive composite application prior applying the adherent PFC material.
SBS was evaluated after thermocycling the specimens (6000 cycles, 5°C
and 55°C).
Results: Three-way ANOVA showed that both the surface
contamination and the surface treatment signficantly affected the bond
strength (p < 0.05). Saliva contamination reduced the SBS more than
did the water contamination. SBS loss after saliva contamination was
73.7% and 31.3% for PFC and FRC, respectively. After water
contamination, SBS loss was 17.2% and 13.3% for PFC and FRC,
respectively. The type of surface treatment was significant for PFC (p
< 0.05), but not for FRC (p = 0.572).
Conclusion: Upon
contamination of freshly cured PFC or semi-IPN FRC, surfaces should be
re-prepared via phosphoric acid etching, water cleaning, drying, and
application of adhesive composite in order to recover optimal bond
strength.

Kokoelmat
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet [19207]

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Tämä kokoelma

JulkaisuajatTekijätNimekkeetAsiasanatTiedekuntaLaitosOppiaineYhteisöt ja kokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste