Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä aineisto 
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Standing is associated with insulin sensitivity in adults with metabolic syndrome

Koivumäki Mikko; Heinonen Ilkka; Garthwaite Taru; Löyttyniemi Eliisa; Knuuti Juhani; Houttu Noora; Laitinen Kirsi; Vasankari Tommi; Vähä-Ypyä Henri; Laine Saara; Saarenhovi Maria; Sievänen Harri; Kallio Petri; Sjöros Tanja; Kalliokoski Kari

Standing is associated with insulin sensitivity in adults with metabolic syndrome

Koivumäki Mikko
Heinonen Ilkka
Garthwaite Taru
Löyttyniemi Eliisa
Knuuti Juhani
Houttu Noora
Laitinen Kirsi
Vasankari Tommi
Vähä-Ypyä Henri
Laine Saara
Saarenhovi Maria
Sievänen Harri
Kallio Petri
Sjöros Tanja
Kalliokoski Kari
Katso/Avaa
Publisher's PDF (411.5Kb)
Lataukset: 

doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2021.08.009
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2021102752575
Tiivistelmä

Abstract

Objectives
To determine how components of accelerometer-measured sedentary behavior (SB) and physical activity (PA), and fitness are associated with insulin sensitivity in adults with metabolic syndrome.

Design
Cross-sectional.

Methods
Target population was middle-aged (40–65 years) sedentary adults with metabolic syndrome. SB, breaks in SB, standing, and PA were measured for four weeks with hip-worn accelerometers. VO2max (ml/min/kg) was measured with maximal cycle ergometry. Insulin sensitivity was determined by hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp (M-value) and fasting blood sampling (HOMA-IR, insulin). Multivariable regression was used for analyses.

Results
Sixty-four participants (37 women; 58.3 [SD 6.8] years) were included. Participants spent 10.0 (1.0) h sedentary, 1.8 (0.6) h standing, and 2.7 (0.6) h in PA and took 5149 (1825) steps and 29 (8) breaks daily. In sex-, age- and accelerometer wear time-adjusted model SB, standing, steps and VO2max were associated with M-value (β = −0.384; β = 0.400; β = 0.350; β = 0.609, respectively), HOMA-IR (β = 0.420; β = −0.548; β = −0.252; β = −0.449), and insulin (β = 0.433; β = −0.541; β = −0.252; β = −0.453); all p-values < 0.05. Breaks associated only with M-value (β = 0.277). When further adjusted for body fat %, only standing remained significantly associated with HOMA-IR (β = −0.381) and insulin (β = −0.366); significance was maintained even when further adjusted for SB, PA and fitness. Light and moderate-to-vigorous PA were not associated with insulin sensitivity.

Conclusions
Standing is associated with insulin sensitivity markers. The association with HOMA-IR and insulin is independent of adiposity, PA, SB and fitness. Further studies are warranted, but these findings encourage replacing sitting with standing for potential improvements in insulin sensitivity in adults at increased type 2 diabetes risk.

Abbreviations
APEangle for posture estimation; BPblood pressure; FFMfat free mass; HOMA-IRhomeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance; LPAlight physical activity; MADmean amplitude deviation; METmetabolic equivalent; MetSmetabolic syndrome; MVPAmoderate-to-vigorous physical activity; NEFAnon-esterified fatty acids; PAphysical activity; SBsedentary behavior; T2Dtype 2 diabetes; WCwaist circumference

Kokoelmat
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet [19207]

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Tämä kokoelma

JulkaisuajatTekijätNimekkeetAsiasanatTiedekuntaLaitosOppiaineYhteisöt ja kokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste