Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä aineisto 
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

What’s in a Name? Constantinople’s Lost ‘Golden Gate’ Reconsidered

Georges Kazan

What’s in a Name? Constantinople’s Lost ‘Golden Gate’ Reconsidered

Georges Kazan
Katso/Avaa
GoldenGatesfinalmanuscript.pdf (1.833Mb)
Lataukset: 

Brepols
URI
http://www.brepols.net/Pages/ShowProduct.aspx?prod_id=IS-9782503575858-1
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2021042717533
Tiivistelmä

The Golden Gate (Porta Aurea) provides critical
information about how Constantinople’s emperors sought to present themselves,
their capital and its empire to the city’s inhabitants and to the outside
world. Today, the most famous gate to bear this name survives in the Theodosian
Walls of Constantinople. However an earlier Golden Gate may once have stood
about a mile to the east, in the Walls of Constantine. This study will explore
the origins of the Golden Gate at Constantinople by examining the construction,
purpose and dating of this lost gate. As with many aspects of Constantinople’s
material history, evidence remains sparse. A broad range of material has
therefore been considered, including archaeological and written evidence not
only from Constantinople but also from across the Roman Empire. At Rome, the
tradition of triumphal monuments such as the Porta Triumphalis is considered,
along with arches and gates dedicated by Constantine in Rome and on routes
leading to it. At Alexandria, the dedication of city gates to the Sun and Moon
is noted, and compared with Constantine’s use of solar imagery in his triumphal
monuments in Rome. Returning to Constantinople, evidence including finds from recent
excavations is used to argue that the lost gate was the main entrance for
triumphal processions through the Walls of Constantine. A reconstruction of its
appearance and decoration is proposed, based on historical accounts and
comparable evidence. The article concludes that while it appears likely that a
triumphal entrance existed in the Walls of Constantine at Constantinople,
probably planned by Constantine and completed soon after his death in 337, it
had no official name, and was first described as a Porta Aurea only by the
Notitia of Constantinople by ca 427, possibly due to gilded decoration that was
either original or applied in ca 416 when a bronze statue of the defeated rebel
Priscus Attalus was probably set up on the gate. This lost triumphal gate would
therefore not only have inspired the construction of the Golden Gate in the
Walls of Theodosius, but may also have influenced its design. While these
conclusions are tentative, it is anticipated that this research on evidence
concerning the former gate will provide a solid basis for the study of the
latter.

Kokoelmat
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet [19207]

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Tämä kokoelma

JulkaisuajatTekijätNimekkeetAsiasanatTiedekuntaLaitosOppiaineYhteisöt ja kokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste