Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä aineisto 
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Cross-site analysis of perceived ecosystem service benefits in multifunctional landscapes

Marco Girardello; Gerardo Moreno; Paul Burgess; Nuria Ferreiro-Domínguez; Anastasia Pantera; Anil Gravesh; Anna Varga; Mario Torralba; Felix Herzog; Tibor Hartel; Sonja Kay; Nora Fagerholm; Josep Crous-Duran; Tobias Plieninger; Stephanie Aviron; Vlad Măcicăsan

Cross-site analysis of perceived ecosystem service benefits in multifunctional landscapes

Marco Girardello
Gerardo Moreno
Paul Burgess
Nuria Ferreiro-Domínguez
Anastasia Pantera
Anil Gravesh
Anna Varga
Mario Torralba
Felix Herzog
Tibor Hartel
Sonja Kay
Nora Fagerholm
Josep Crous-Duran
Tobias Plieninger
Stephanie Aviron
Vlad Măcicăsan
Katso/Avaa
Preprint (1.839Mb)
Lataukset: 

Elsevier Ltd
doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.04.002
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2021042824144
Tiivistelmä

Rural development policies in many Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) member countries promote sustainable landscape management with the intention of providing multiple ecosystem services (ES). Yet, it remains unclear which ES benefits are perceived in different landscapes and by different people. We present an assessment of ES benefits perceived and mapped by residents (n = 2,301) across 13 multifunctional (deep rural to peri-urban) landscapes in Europe. We identify the most intensively perceived ES benefits, their spatial patterns, and the respondent and landscape characteristics that determine ES benefit perception. We find outdoor recreation, aesthetic values and social interactions are the key ES benefits at local scales. Settlement areas are ES benefit hotspots but many benefits are also related to forests, waters and mosaic landscapes. We find some ES benefits (e.g. culture and heritage values) are spatially clustered, while many others (e.g. aesthetic values) are dispersed. ES benefit perception is linked to people’s relationship with and accessibility to a landscape. Our study discusses how a local perspective can contribute to the development of contextualized and socially acceptable policies for sustainable ES management. We also address conceptual confusion in ES framework and present argumentation regarding the links from services to benefits, and from benefits to different types of values.

Kokoelmat
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet [19207]

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Tämä kokoelma

JulkaisuajatTekijätNimekkeetAsiasanatTiedekuntaLaitosOppiaineYhteisöt ja kokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste