Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä aineisto 
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Comparative Analysis of Prothrombin Complex Concentrate and Fresh Frozen Plasma in Coronary Surgery

Biancari Fausto; Ruggieri Vito G.; Perrotti Andrea; Gherli Riccardo; Demal Till; Franzese Ilaria; Dalén Magnus; Santarpino Giuseppe; Rubino Antonino S.; Maselli Daniele; Salsano Antonio; Nicolini Francesco; Saccocci Matteo; Gatti Giuseppe; Rosato Stefano; D’Errigo Paola; Kinnunen Eeva-Maija; De Feo Marisa; Tauriainen Tuomas; Onorati Francesco; Mariscalco Giovanni

Comparative Analysis of Prothrombin Complex Concentrate and Fresh Frozen Plasma in Coronary Surgery

Biancari Fausto
Ruggieri Vito G.
Perrotti Andrea
Gherli Riccardo
Demal Till
Franzese Ilaria
Dalén Magnus
Santarpino Giuseppe
Rubino Antonino S.
Maselli Daniele
Salsano Antonio
Nicolini Francesco
Saccocci Matteo
Gatti Giuseppe
Rosato Stefano
D’Errigo Paola
Kinnunen Eeva-Maija
De Feo Marisa
Tauriainen Tuomas
Onorati Francesco
Mariscalco Giovanni
Katso/Avaa
Final draft (724.8Kb)
Lataukset: 

Blackwell Science Asia
doi:10.1016/j.hlc.2018.10.025
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2021042824628
Tiivistelmä

Background
Recent studies suggested that prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) might be more effective than fresh frozen plasma (FFP) to reduce red blood cell (RBC) transfusion requirement after cardiac surgery.

Methods
This is a comparative analysis of 416 patients who received FFP postoperatively and 119 patients who received PCC with or without FFP after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

Results
Mixed-effects regression analyses adjusted for multiple covariates and participating centres showed that PCC significantly decreased RBC transfusion (67.2% vs. 87.5%, adjusted OR 0.319, 95%CI 0.136–0.752) and platelet transfusion requirements (11.8% vs. 45.2%, adjusted OR 0.238, 95%CI 0.097–0.566) compared with FFP. The PCC cohort received a mean of 2.7 ± 3.7 (median, 2.0, IQR 4) units of RBC and the FFP cohort received a mean of 4.9 ± 6.3 (median, 3.0, IQR 4) units of RBC (adjusted coefficient, −1.926, 95%CI −3.357–0.494). The use of PCC increased the risk of KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) acute kidney injury (41.4% vs. 28.2%, adjusted OR 2.300, 1.203–4.400), but not of KDIGO acute kidney injury stage 3 (6.0% vs. 8.0%, OR 0.850, 95%CI 0.258–2.796) when compared with the FFP cohort.

Conclusions
These results suggest that the use of PCC compared with FFP may reduce the need of blood transfusion after CABG.

Kokoelmat
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet [27094]

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Tämä kokoelma

JulkaisuajatTekijätNimekkeetAsiasanatTiedekuntaLaitosOppiaineYhteisöt ja kokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste