Variation in neurosurgical management of traumatic brain injury: a survey in 68 centers participating in the CENTER-TBI study

Hester F. Lingsma; Andrew I. R. Maas; Suzanne Polinder; Ewout W. Steyerberg; Maryse C. Cnossen; Iain Haitsma; Hugo F. den Boogert; Thomas A. van Essen; Godard C. W. de Ruiter; David Menon; Wilco C. Peul; on behalf of the CENTER-TBI Investigators and Participants
Variation in neurosurgical management of traumatic brain injury: a survey in 68 centers participating in the CENTER-TBI study

Hester F. Lingsma
Andrew I. R. Maas
Suzanne Polinder
Ewout W. Steyerberg
Maryse C. Cnossen
Iain Haitsma
Hugo F. den Boogert
Thomas A. van Essen
Godard C. W. de Ruiter
David Menon
Wilco C. Peul; on behalf of the CENTER-TBI Investigators and Participants
Katso/Avaa
Lataukset: 

Springer
doi:10.1007/s00701-018-3761-z
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2021042824792
Tiivistelmä

BACKGROUND: 

Neurosurgical management of traumatic brain injury (TBI) is challenging, with only low-quality evidence. We aimed to explore differences in neurosurgical strategies for TBI across Europe.

METHODS: 

A survey was sent to 68 centers participating in the Collaborative European Neurotrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) study. The questionnaire contained 21 questions, including the decision when to operate (or not) on traumatic acute subdural hematoma (ASDH) and intracerebral hematoma (ICH), and when to perform a decompressive craniectomy (DC) in raised intracranial pressure (ICP).

RESULTS: 

The survey was completed by 68 centers (100%). On average, 10 neurosurgeons work in each trauma center. In all centers, a neurosurgeon was available within 30 min. Forty percent of responders reported a thickness or volume threshold for evacuation of an ASDH. Most responders (78%) decide on a primary DC in evacuating an ASDH during the operation, when swelling is present. For ICH, 3% would perform an evacuation directly to prevent secondary deterioration and 66% only in case of clinical deterioration. Most respondents (91%) reported to consider a DC for refractory high ICP. The reported cut-off ICP for DC in refractory high ICP, however, differed: 60% uses 25 mmHg, 18% 30 mmHg, and 17% 20 mmHg. Treatment strategies varied substantially between regions, specifically for the threshold for ASDH surgery and DC for refractory raised ICP. Also within center variation was present: 31% reported variation within the hospital for inserting an ICP monitor and 43% for evacuating mass lesions.

CONCLUSION: 

Despite a homogeneous organization, considerable practice variation exists of neurosurgical strategies for TBI in Europe. These results provide an incentive for comparative effectiveness research to determine elements of effective neurosurgical care.

Kokoelmat