Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä aineisto 
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Runs of homozygosity and testicular cancer risk

K. Muir; A. Sud K. Litchfield; Z. Kote‐Jarai; R. A. Huddart; N. Pashayan; UK Testicular Cancer Collaboration; The PRACTICAL Consortium; A. Reid; N. Orr; A. M. Dunning; D. Dudakia; J. Peto; D. F. Easton; P. Broderick; M. Levy; R. Eeles; C. Loveday; C. Turnbull; A. Holroyd; R. S. Houlston

Runs of homozygosity and testicular cancer risk

K. Muir
A. Sud K. Litchfield
Z. Kote‐Jarai
R. A. Huddart
N. Pashayan; UK Testicular Cancer Collaboration; The PRACTICAL Consortium; A. Reid
N. Orr
A. M. Dunning
D. Dudakia
J. Peto
D. F. Easton
P. Broderick
M. Levy
R. Eeles
C. Loveday
C. Turnbull
A. Holroyd
R. S. Houlston
Katso/Avaa
Final draft (668.1Kb)
Lataukset: 

WILEY
doi:10.1111/andr.12667
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2021042825076
Tiivistelmä

Background Testicular germ cell tumour (TGCT) is highly heritable but > 50% of the genetic risk remains unexplained. Epidemiological observation of greater relative risk to brothers of men with TGCT compared to sons has long alluded to recessively acting TGCT genetic susceptibility factors, but to date none have been reported. Runs of homozygosity (RoH) are a signature indicating underlying recessively acting alleles and have been associated with increased risk of other cancer types.

Objective To examine whether RoH are associated with TGCT risk.

Methods We performed a genome-wide RoH analysis using GWAS data from 3206 TGCT cases and 7422 controls uniformly genotyped using the OncoArray platform.

Results Global measures of homozygosity were not significantly different between cases and controls, and the frequency of individual consensus RoH was not significantly different between cases and controls, after correction for multiple testing. RoH at three regions, 11p13-11p14.3, 5q14.1-5q22.3 and 13q14.11-13q.14.13, were, however, nominally statistically significant at p < 0.01. Intriguingly, RoH200 at 11p13-11p14.3 encompasses Wilms tumour 1 (WT1), a recognized cancer susceptibility gene with roles in sex determination and developmental transcriptional regulation, processes repeatedly implicated in TGCT aetiology.

Discussion and conclusion Overall, our data do not support a major role in the risk of TGCT for recessively acting alleles acting through homozygosity, as measured by RoH in outbred populations of cases and controls.

Kokoelmat
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet [19207]

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Tämä kokoelma

JulkaisuajatTekijätNimekkeetAsiasanatTiedekuntaLaitosOppiaineYhteisöt ja kokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste