Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä aineisto 
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Challenges in Mathematical Cognition: A Collaboratively-Derived Research Agenda

Ansari Daniel; Hannula-Sormunen Minna; Schneider Michael; McNeil Nicole; Simms Victoria; Bisson Marie-Josée; Gilmore Camilla; Göbel Silke M.; Inglis Matthew; Mazzocco Michèle; Weber Keith; Hodgen Jeremy; Batchelor Sophie; De Smedt Bert; Jones Ian; Alcock Lara

Challenges in Mathematical Cognition: A Collaboratively-Derived Research Agenda

Ansari Daniel
Hannula-Sormunen Minna
Schneider Michael
McNeil Nicole
Simms Victoria
Bisson Marie-Josée
Gilmore Camilla
Göbel Silke M.
Inglis Matthew
Mazzocco Michèle
Weber Keith
Hodgen Jeremy
Batchelor Sophie
De Smedt Bert
Jones Ian
Alcock Lara
Katso/Avaa
publisher´s version (408.7Kb)
Lataukset: 

PsychOpen
doi:10.5964/jnc.v2i1.10
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2021042716433
Tiivistelmä

This paper reports on a collaborative exercise designed to generate a coherent agenda for research on mathematical cognition. Following an established method, the exercise brought together 16 mathematical cognition researchers from across the fields of mathematics education,psychology and neuroscience. These participants engaged in a process in which they generated an initial list of research questions with the potential to significantly advance understanding of mathematical cognition, winnowed this list to a smaller set of priority questions, and refined the eventual questions to meet criteria related to clarity, specificity and practicability. The resulting list comprises 26 questions divided into sixbroad topic areas: elucidating the nature of mathematical thinking, mapping predictors and processes of competence development, charting developmental trajectories and their interactions, fostering conceptual understanding and procedural skill, designing effective interventions, and developing valid and reliable measures. In presenting these questions in this paper, we intend to support greater coherence in both investigation and reporting, to build a stronger base of information for consideration by policymakers, and to encourage researchers to take a consilient approach to addressing important challenges in mathematical cognition.


Kokoelmat
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet [19207]

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Tämä kokoelma

JulkaisuajatTekijätNimekkeetAsiasanatTiedekuntaLaitosOppiaineYhteisöt ja kokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste