Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä aineisto 
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Comparison of enzymatic and pH shift methods to extract protein from whole Baltic herring (Clupea harengus membras) and roach (Rutilus rutilus)

Kakko Tanja; Honkapää Kaisu; Lantto Raija; Nisov Anni; Alakomi Hanna-Leena

Comparison of enzymatic and pH shift methods to extract protein from whole Baltic herring (Clupea harengus membras) and roach (Rutilus rutilus)

Kakko Tanja
Honkapää Kaisu
Lantto Raija
Nisov Anni
Alakomi Hanna-Leena
Katso/Avaa
Publisher's PDF (1.469Mb)
Lataukset: 

Elsevier Ltd
doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131524
URI
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308814621025309?via%3Dihub
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2021120158405
Tiivistelmä

This study aimed to establish the differences between enzymatically extracted hydrolysates and pH shifted protein isolates from whole Baltic herring and roach in terms of polypeptide patterns, functionality, sensory properties, microbial quality, yield, and composition. Alkaline extraction resulted in the highest yields, whereas the hydrolysates showed the highest protein contents. The hydrolysates showed higher protein solubility (86.0–88.5%) than the protein isolates (5.1–14.5%) as well as the higher foam capacity for Baltic herring. However, for roach, alkaline extracted protein isolates exhibited the highest foam capacity. All hydrolysates showed poor foam stability (0–13%) while the protein isolates showed notably higher stability (30–55%). The hydrolysates showed relatively low bitterness, whereas alkaline extracted roach proteins were perceived as bitter. This study demonstrated that it was possible to produce protein isolates and hydrolysates from whole fish with good microbial quality. However, both processes need to be optimised according to the food application and fish species.

Kokoelmat
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet [19207]

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Tämä kokoelma

JulkaisuajatTekijätNimekkeetAsiasanatTiedekuntaLaitosOppiaineYhteisöt ja kokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste