Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä aineisto 
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Tasks, multitasking and interruptions among the surgical team in an operating room: a prospective observational study

Karin Pukk-Härenstam; Karolina Olin; Anna Ehrenberg; Ulrica Nilsson; Mirjam Ekstedt; Mesfin Kassaye Tessma; Camilla Göras; Maria Unbeck

Tasks, multitasking and interruptions among the surgical team in an operating room: a prospective observational study

Karin Pukk-Härenstam
Karolina Olin
Anna Ehrenberg
Ulrica Nilsson
Mirjam Ekstedt
Mesfin Kassaye Tessma
Camilla Göras
Maria Unbeck
Katso/Avaa
Publisher's PDF (515.2Kb)
Lataukset: 

BMJ Publishing
doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026410
URI
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/5/e026410
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2021042826069
Tiivistelmä

Objectives: The work context of the operating room (OR) is considered complex and dynamic with high cognitive demands. A multidimensional view of the complete preoperative and intraoperative work process of the surgical team in the OR has been sparsely described. The aim of this study was to describe the type and frequency of tasks, multitasking, interruptions and their causes during surgical procedures from a multidimensional perspective on the surgical team in the OR.

Design: Prospective observational study using the Work Observation Method By Activity Timing tool.

Setting: An OR department at a county hospital in Sweden.

Participants: OR nurses (ORNs) (n=10), registered nurse anaesthetists (RNAs) (n=8) and surgeons (n=9).

Results: The type, frequency and time spent on specific tasks, multitasking and interruptions were measured. From a multidimensional view, the surgical team performed 64 tasks per hour. Communication represented almost half (45.7%) of all observed tasks. Concerning task time, direct care dominated the surgeons’ and ORNs’ intraoperative time, while in RNAs’ work, it was intra-indirect care. In total, 48.2% of time was spent in multitasking and was most often observed in ORNs’ and surgeons’ work during communication. Interruptions occurred 3.0 per hour, and the largest proportion, 26.7%, was related to equipment. Interruptions were most commonly followed by professional communication.

Conclusions: The surgical team constantly dealt with multitasking and interruptions, both with potential impact on workflow and patient safety. Interruptions were commonly followed by professional communication, which may reflect the interactions and constant adaptations in a complex adaptive system. Future research should focus on understanding the complexity within the system, on the design of different work processes and on how teams meet the challenges of a complex adaptive system.

Kokoelmat
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet [19206]

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Tämä kokoelma

JulkaisuajatTekijätNimekkeetAsiasanatTiedekuntaLaitosOppiaineYhteisöt ja kokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste