Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä aineisto 
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Development of otology specific outcome measure: Ear Outcome Survey-16 (EOS-16)

Aarnisalo Antti A.; Hirvonen Timo; Suutarla Samuli; Jero Jussi; Dietz Aarno; Laakso Juha T.; Sinkkonen Saku T.; Haavisto Lotta; Hytönen Maija; Silvola Juha; Saarinen Riitta; Kivekäs Ilkka; Laitakari Jaakko

Development of otology specific outcome measure: Ear Outcome Survey-16 (EOS-16)

Aarnisalo Antti A.
Hirvonen Timo
Suutarla Samuli
Jero Jussi
Dietz Aarno
Laakso Juha T.
Sinkkonen Saku T.
Haavisto Lotta
Hytönen Maija
Silvola Juha
Saarinen Riitta
Kivekäs Ilkka
Laitakari Jaakko
Katso/Avaa
Publisher's PDF (1.508Mb)
Lataukset: 

PLA General Hospital Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
doi:10.1016/j.joto.2021.01.003
URI
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1672293021000039?via=ihub
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2021042825840
Tiivistelmä

Purpose

An important outcome measure of patient care is the impact on the patient’s health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Current ear-specific HRQoL instruments are designed for one diagnosis and emphasize different subdivisions such as symptoms, hearing problems, psychosocial impact, and the need for care. The optimal length of the recall period has not been studied. For these reasons, a new survey is needed that would cover most chronic ear diseases.

Methods

A preliminary 24-item survey (EOS-24) was created. Untreated adult patients (included n = 186) with one of seven different chronic otologic conditions from all university hospitals in Finland were recruited to respond to EOS-24 and the 15D general HRQoL instrument. The recruiting otologists evaluated the severity of the disease and the disability caused by it. A control group was recruited. Based on the patients’ responses in different diagnosis groups, the items were reduced according to pre-defined criteria. The resulting survey was validated using a thorough statistical analysis.

Results

The relevance and necessity of the original 24 items were thoroughly investigated, leading to the exclusion of 8 items and the modification of 1. The remaining 16 items were well-balanced between subdivisions and were useful in all seven diagnosis groups, thus constituting the final instrument, EOS-16. The most suitable recall period was three months.

Conclusions

EOS-16 has been created according to the HRQoL survey guidelines with a versatile nationwide patient population. The survey has been validated and can be used for a wide range of chronic ear diseases as a HRQoL instrument.

Kokoelmat
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet [19207]

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Tämä kokoelma

JulkaisuajatTekijätNimekkeetAsiasanatTiedekuntaLaitosOppiaineYhteisöt ja kokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste