Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä aineisto 
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Trends in the surgical management of vesicoureteral reflux in Finland in 2004-2014

Sipilä Jussi; Kytö Ville; Kauko Tommi; Rautava Päivi; Pakkasjärvi Niklas; Ripatti Liisi; Viljamaa Hanna-Reeta

Trends in the surgical management of vesicoureteral reflux in Finland in 2004-2014

Sipilä Jussi
Kytö Ville
Kauko Tommi
Rautava Päivi
Pakkasjärvi Niklas
Ripatti Liisi
Viljamaa Hanna-Reeta
Katso/Avaa
Publisher's version (1.367Mb)
Lataukset: 

doi:10.1080/21681805.2020.1849387
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2021042821982
Tiivistelmä

Objectives: Previous data on the trends of surgical treatment of vesicoureteral reflux outside USA are
scarce. The aim of this study was to clarify the national trends of operative treatment of vesicoureteral
reflux (VUR) in Finland.
Methods: We analyzed national data from Finnish Care Register for Health Care on children (<16 years
of age) surgically treated for VUR in 2004–2014.
Results: Endoscopic injections of the ureteral orifices were primarily performed for 1212 and open
ureteral reimplantation for 272 children. The use of both types of surgery decreased during the study
period (p=0.0043 and p<0.001, respectively). The median age at surgery for VUR was lower in those
treated with open ureteral reimplantation than those with endoscopic injections of the ureteral orifices
[3 and 4 years, respectively] (p=0.0001). The length of hospital stay was significantly longer (median
9.9 days) with open ureteral reimplantation compared to that (median 1.3 days) with endoscopic injections
(p<0.0001) and did not change during the study period. Reoperations were significantly more
common in patients who were primarily treated with endoscopic injections (n=146/1072, 14%) than
with ureteral reimplantation (n=7/230, 3%) (p<0.0001).
Conclusions: While the best treatment options for VUR remain debatable, operative treatment of VUR
has become less common in Finland.

Kokoelmat
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet [19207]

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Tämä kokoelma

JulkaisuajatTekijätNimekkeetAsiasanatTiedekuntaLaitosOppiaineYhteisöt ja kokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste