Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä aineisto 
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Systems Thinking for Understanding Sustainability? Nordic Student Teachers’ Views on the Relationship between Species Identification, Biodiversity and Sustainable Development

Eila Jeronen; Eija Yli-Panula; Irmeli Palmberg; Maria Hofman-Bergholm

Systems Thinking for Understanding Sustainability? Nordic Student Teachers’ Views on the Relationship between Species Identification, Biodiversity and Sustainable Development

Eila Jeronen
Eija Yli-Panula
Irmeli Palmberg
Maria Hofman-Bergholm
Katso/Avaa
Systems thinking final 2017.pdf (597.2Kb)
Lataukset: 

MDPI AG
doi:10.3390/educsci7030072
URI
http://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/7/3/72
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2021042717050
Tiivistelmä

Sustainability is a complex concept including
ecological, economic and social dimensions, which in turn involve several
aspects that are interrelated in a complex way, such as cultural, health and
political aspects. Systems thinking, which focuses on a system’s interrelated
parts, could therefore help people understand the complexity of sustainability.
The aim of this study is to analyse student teachers’ level of systems thinking
regarding sustainability, especially the ecological dimension, and how they
explain the relationship between species identification, biodiversity and
sustainability. Nordic student teachers (N
= 424) participated in a questionnaire and their open answers were
content-analysed and categorised. The results indicate the student teachers’
low level of systems thinking regarding ecological sustainability. About a
quarter of them (25.4%) had a basic level including interconnections (13.7
Academic Editor: name), additional feedback (8.9%) and also behavioural aspects
(2.8%), but none of them reached an intermediate or advanced level. The low
level of systems thinking could be explained by two main factors: (1) Systems
thinking has not been used as an educational method of developing understanding
of sustainability in teacher education programmes; and (2) systems thinking is
also a result of life experiences; the older ones showing more systems thinking
than the younger ones. Therefore, elementary forms of systems thinking should
be an educational method already in primary education.

Kokoelmat
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet [19207]

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Tämä kokoelma

JulkaisuajatTekijätNimekkeetAsiasanatTiedekuntaLaitosOppiaineYhteisöt ja kokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste