Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

Phronetic leadership style evaluation with a fuzzy logic application

Einolander Jarno; Kantola Jussi; Vanharanta Hannu; Markopoulos Evangelos; Sivula Ari

dc.contributor.authorEinolander Jarno
dc.contributor.authorKantola Jussi
dc.contributor.authorVanharanta Hannu
dc.contributor.authorMarkopoulos Evangelos
dc.contributor.authorSivula Ari
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-28T13:26:28Z
dc.date.available2022-10-28T13:26:28Z
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/165190
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of leadership style assessments is to determine the basic features and characteristics of leadership behaviours and to reveal the leader's personality traits and abilities and to increase their self-awareness. The style can be, for example, democratic, autocratic, bureaucratic, laissez-faire, strategic, visionary, transformational, or transactional. However, ordinary assessments do not help leaders analyze their knowledge and wisdom behind their behaviours. The Wisdom Cube seeks to explain wisdom through the four dimensions of wisdom and provides a practical way of understanding the knowledge and wisdom in leadership. By utilising the dimensions and planes of the Wisdom Cube, we can find the way from data handling, information processing, and knowledge creation to wisdom generation. The aim of this research is, therefore, to reveal the ontology of the phronetic leader and to create a practical evaluation tool for leaders. The content of the article covers the elements of the Wisdom Cube, presents related efforts to measure and analyze phronetic leadership characteristics, and shows the practical results of the first test runs with the fuzzy logic-based application. The personal deep understanding of the leadership traits may then help the leaders to turn their current leadership styles more phronetic.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
dc.titlePhronetic leadership style evaluation with a fuzzy logic application
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1463922X.2020.1768319
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021042827046
dc.relation.volume22
dc.contributor.organizationfi=PÄÄT Konetekniikka|en=PÄÄT Mechanical Engineering|
dc.contributor.organization-code2606022
dc.converis.publication-id49330619
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/49330619
dc.format.pagerange317
dc.format.pagerange337
dc.identifier.eissn1464-536X
dc.identifier.jour-issn1463-922X
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKantola, Jussi
dc.okm.discipline512 Liiketaloustiedefi_FI
dc.okm.discipline512 Business and managementen_GB
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeJournal article
dc.publisher.countryBritanniafi_FI
dc.publisher.countryUnited Kingdomen_GB
dc.publisher.country-codeGB
dc.relation.doi10.1080/1463922X.2020.1768319
dc.relation.ispartofjournalTheoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science
dc.relation.issue3
dc.year.issued2020


Aineistoon kuuluvat tiedostot

Thumbnail

Aineisto kuuluu seuraaviin kokoelmiin

Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot