Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä aineisto 
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Validity and reliability of the Fatigue Severity Scale in Finnish multiple sclerosis patients

Juhani Ruutiainen; Anna Wiksten; Tanja Hakkarainen; Päivi Hämäläinen; Eija Rosti-Otajärvi

Validity and reliability of the Fatigue Severity Scale in Finnish multiple sclerosis patients

Juhani Ruutiainen
Anna Wiksten
Tanja Hakkarainen
Päivi Hämäläinen
Eija Rosti-Otajärvi
Katso/Avaa
Publisher's version (373.9Kb)
Lataukset: 

Wiley Open Access
doi:10.1002/brb3.725
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2021042717157
Tiivistelmä

Background

Fatigue is one of the most debilitating symptoms in multiple sclerosis (MS) considerably interfering with patients’ daily functioning. Both researchers and clinicians need psychometrically robust methods to evaluate fatigue in MS.

Objectives

The objective of this study was (i) to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Finnish version of the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) and (ii) to describe the results among patients with MS.

Methods

In total, 553 patients with MS (mean age, 53.8 years; standard deviation [SD], 11.4; 79% women: mean patient-defined disease severity, Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] 4.0, SD, 2.5) completed the self-administered questionnaires including the FSS. A standard procedure was used for the translation of the FSS.

Results

The mean (SD) score for the FSS was 4.5 (1.7); in 65% of the patients, the score was ≥4.0. The data quality of the FSS was excellent, with 99.6% of computable scale scores. Floor and ceiling effects were minimal. The FSS showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha, 0.95). Unidimensionality was supported based on confirmatory factor analysis with the comparative fit index being 0.94. The FSS showed moderate/high correlations with the perceived burden of the disease, quality of life and disease severity, whereas, age or gender did not have a significant effect on the FSS score.

Conclusions

The Finnish version of the FSS showed satisfactory reliability and validity and thus can be regarded as a feasible measure of self-reported fatigue.


Kokoelmat
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet [19207]

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Tämä kokoelma

JulkaisuajatTekijätNimekkeetAsiasanatTiedekuntaLaitosOppiaineYhteisöt ja kokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste