Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä aineisto 
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

EACVI survey on investigations and imaging modalities in chronic coronary syndromes

Podlesnikar Tomaz; Schultz-Menger Jeanette; Saraste Antti; Williams Michelle C; Cameli Matteo; Holte Espen; Manka Robert; Fontes-Carvalho Ricardo; Haugaa Kristina H; Dweck Marc R; Stankovic Ivan; Bularga Anda; Newby David E; Michalski Blazej; Mills Nicholas L; D'Andrea Antonello

EACVI survey on investigations and imaging modalities in chronic coronary syndromes

Podlesnikar Tomaz
Schultz-Menger Jeanette
Saraste Antti
Williams Michelle C
Cameli Matteo
Holte Espen
Manka Robert
Fontes-Carvalho Ricardo
Haugaa Kristina H
Dweck Marc R
Stankovic Ivan
Bularga Anda
Newby David E
Michalski Blazej
Mills Nicholas L
D'Andrea Antonello
Katso/Avaa
Publisher´s pdf (770.9Kb)
Lataukset: 

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
doi:10.1093/ehjci/jeaa300
URI
https://academic.oup.com/ehjcimaging/article/22/1/1/5961505
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2021093049004
Tiivistelmä

Aims

The European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) Scientific Initiatives Committee performed a global survey to evaluate current practice for the assessment and management of patients with suspected and confirmed chronic coronary syndromes.

Methods and results

One-hundred and ten imaging centres from 37 countries across the world responded to the survey. Most non-invasive investigations for coronary artery disease were widely available, except cardiovascular magnetic resonance (available 40% centres). Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and nuclear scans were reported by a multi-disciplinary team in only a quarter of centres. In the initial assessment of patients presenting with chest pain, only 32% of respondents indicated that they rely on pre-test probability for selecting the optimal imaging test while 31% proceed directly to CCTA. In patients with established coronary artery disease and recurrent chest pain, respondents opted for stress echocardiography (27%) and nuclear stress perfusion scans (26%). In asymptomatic patients with coronary artery disease and an obstructive (>70%) right coronary artery stenosis, 58% of respondents were happy to pursue medical therapy without further testing or intervention. This proportion fell to 29% with left anterior descending artery stenosis and 1% with left main stem obstruction. In asymptomatic patients with evidence of moderate-to-severe myocardial ischaemia (15%), only 18% of respondents would continue medical therapy without further investigation.

Conclusion

Despite guidelines recommendations pre-test probability is used to assess patients with suspected coronary artery in a minority of centres, one-third of centres moving directly to CCTA. Clinicians remain reticent to pursue a strategy of optimal medical therapy without further investigation or intervention in patients with controlled symptoms but obstructive coronary artery stenoses or myocardial ischaemia.

Kokoelmat
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet [19207]

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Tämä kokoelma

JulkaisuajatTekijätNimekkeetAsiasanatTiedekuntaLaitosOppiaineYhteisöt ja kokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste