Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) in blood cultures: Validation in 55 european laboratories

Vennberg L.; Åkerlund A.; Kahlmeter G; the RAST Study Group; Jonasson E.; Akyar I.; Hazirolan G.; Gelmez G.A.; Kaygisiz A.N.S.

dc.contributor.authorVennberg L.
dc.contributor.authorÅkerlund A.
dc.contributor.authorKahlmeter G; the RAST Study Group
dc.contributor.authorJonasson E.
dc.contributor.authorAkyar I.
dc.contributor.authorHazirolan G.
dc.contributor.authorGelmez G.A.
dc.contributor.authorKaygisiz A.N.S.
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-28T14:18:12Z
dc.date.available2022-10-28T14:18:12Z
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/170570
dc.description.abstract<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>When bloodstream infections are caused by resistant bacteria, rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) is important for adjustment of therapy. The EUCAST RAST method, directly from positive blood cultures, was validated in a multi-laboratory study in Europe.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>RAST was performed in 40 laboratories in northern Europe (NE) and 15 in southern Europe (SE) from clinical blood cultures positive for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus or Streptococcus pneumoniae. Categorical results at 4, 6 and 8 h of incubation were compared with results for EUCAST standard 16-20 h disc diffusion. The method, preliminary breakpoints and the performance of the laboratories were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total number of isolates was 833/318 in NE/SE. The number of zone diameters that could be read (88%, 96% and 99%) and interpreted (70%, 81% and 85%) increased with incubation time (4, 6 and 8 h). The categorical agreement was acceptable, with total error rates in NE/SE of 2.4%/4.9% at 4 h, 1.1%/3.5% at 6 h and 1.1%/3.3% at 8 h. False susceptibility at 4, 6 and 8 h of incubation was below 0.3% and 1.1% in NE and SE, respectively, and the corresponding percentages for false resistance were below 1.9% and 2.8%. After fine-tuning breakpoints, more zones could be interpreted (73%, 89% and 93%), with only marginally affected error rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The EUCAST RAST method can be implemented in routine laboratories without major investments. It provides reliable antimicrobial susceptibility testing results for relevant bloodstream infection pathogens after 4-6 h of incubation.</p>
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.titleEUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) in blood cultures: Validation in 55 european laboratories
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021042826001
dc.relation.volume75
dc.contributor.organizationfi=tyks, vsshp|en=tyks, vsshp|
dc.converis.publication-id52228007
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/52228007
dc.format.pagerange3230
dc.format.pagerange3238
dc.identifier.eissn1460-2091
dc.identifier.jour-issn0305-7453
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorDataimport, tyks, vsshp
dc.okm.discipline3111 Biolääketieteetfi_FI
dc.okm.discipline3111 Biomedicineen_GB
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeJournal article
dc.publisher.countryBritanniafi_FI
dc.publisher.countryUnited Kingdomen_GB
dc.publisher.country-codeGB
dc.relation.doi10.1093/jac/dkaa333
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
dc.relation.issue11
dc.year.issued2020


Aineistoon kuuluvat tiedostot

Thumbnail

Aineisto kuuluu seuraaviin kokoelmiin

Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot