Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä aineisto 
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of daily monitoring visual analog scales in MASK-air (R)

Sousa-Pinto Bernardo; Eklund Patrik; Pfaar Oliver; Klimek Ludger; Zuberbier Torsten; Czarlewski Wienczyslawa; Bédard Annabelle; Bindslev-Jensen Carsten; Bedbrook Anna; Bosnic-Anticevich Sinthia; Brussino Luisa; Cardona Victoria; Cruz Alvaro A.; de Vries Govert; Devillier Philippe; Fokkens Wytske J.; Fuentes-Pérez José Miguel; Gemicioğlu Bilun; Haahtela Tari; Huerta-Villalobos Yunen Rocío; Ivancevich Juan Carlos; Kull Inger; Kuna Piotr; Kvedariene Violeta; Linnemann Désirée E. Larenas; Laune Daniel; Makris Michael; Melén Erik; Morais-Almeida Mário; Mösges Ralph; Mullol Joaquim; O'Hehir Robyn E.; Papadopoulos Nikolaos G.; Pereira Ana Margarida; Prokopakis Emmanuel P.; Psarros Fotis; Regateiro Frederico S.; Reitsma Sietze; Samolinski Boleslaw; Scichilone Nicola; da Silva Jane; Stellato Cristiana; Todo-Bom Ana; Tomazic Peter Valentin; Toppila Salmi Sanna; Valero Antonio; Valiulis Arunas; Valovirta Erkka; van Eerd Michiel; Ventura Maria Teresa; Yorgancioglu Arzu; Basagaña Xavier; Antó Josep M.; Bousquet Jean; Fonseca João Almeida

Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of daily monitoring visual analog scales in MASK-air (R)

Sousa-Pinto Bernardo
Eklund Patrik
Pfaar Oliver
Klimek Ludger
Zuberbier Torsten
Czarlewski Wienczyslawa
Bédard Annabelle
Bindslev-Jensen Carsten
Bedbrook Anna
Bosnic-Anticevich Sinthia
Brussino Luisa
Cardona Victoria
Cruz Alvaro A.
de Vries Govert
Devillier Philippe
Fokkens Wytske J.
Fuentes-Pérez José Miguel
Gemicioğlu Bilun
Haahtela Tari
Huerta-Villalobos Yunen Rocío
Ivancevich Juan Carlos
Kull Inger
Kuna Piotr
Kvedariene Violeta
Linnemann Désirée E. Larenas
Laune Daniel
Makris Michael
Melén Erik
Morais-Almeida Mário
Mösges Ralph
Mullol Joaquim
O'Hehir Robyn E.
Papadopoulos Nikolaos G.
Pereira Ana Margarida
Prokopakis Emmanuel P.
Psarros Fotis
Regateiro Frederico S.
Reitsma Sietze
Samolinski Boleslaw
Scichilone Nicola
da Silva Jane
Stellato Cristiana
Todo-Bom Ana
Tomazic Peter Valentin
Toppila Salmi Sanna
Valero Antonio
Valiulis Arunas
Valovirta Erkka
van Eerd Michiel
Ventura Maria Teresa
Yorgancioglu Arzu
Basagaña Xavier
Antó Josep M.
Bousquet Jean
Fonseca João Almeida
Katso/Avaa
Publisher's PDF (457.6Kb)
Lataukset: 

WILEY
doi:10.1002/clt2.12062
URI
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clt2.12062
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2021102952985
Tiivistelmä


Background

MASK-air (R) is an app that supports allergic rhinitis patients in disease control. Users register daily allergy symptoms and their impact on activities using visual analog scales (VASs). We aimed to assess the concurrent validity, reliability, and responsiveness of these daily VASs.

Methods

Daily monitoring VAS data were assessed in MASK-air (R) users with allergic rhinitis. Concurrent validity was assessed by correlating daily VAS values with those of the EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) VAS, the Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test (CARAT) score, and the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Allergic Specific (WPAI-AS) Questionnaire (work and activity impairment scores). Intra-rater reliability was assessed in users providing multiple daily VASs within the same day. Test-retest reliability was tested in clinically stable users, as defined by the EQ-5D VAS, CARAT, or "VAS Work" (i.e., VAS assessing the impact of allergy on work). Responsiveness was determined in users with two consecutive measurements of EQ-5D-VAS or "VAS Work" indicating clinical change.

Results

A total of 17,780 MASK-air (R) users, with 317,176 VAS days, were assessed. Concurrent validity was moderate-high (Spearman correlation coefficient range: 0.437-0.716). Intra-rater reliability intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) ranged between 0.870 (VAS assessing global allergy symptoms) and 0.937 (VAS assessing allergy symptoms on sleep). Test-retest reliability ICCs ranged between 0.604 and 0.878-"VAS Work" and "VAS asthma" presented the highest ICCs. Moderate/large responsiveness effect sizes were observed-the sleep VAS was associated with lower responsiveness, while the global allergy symptoms VAS demonstrated higher responsiveness.

Conclusion

In MASK-air (R), daily monitoring VASs have high intra-rater reliability and moderate-high validity, reliability, and responsiveness, pointing to a reliable measure of symptom loads.

Kokoelmat
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet [27094]

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Tämä kokoelma

JulkaisuajatTekijätNimekkeetAsiasanatTiedekuntaLaitosOppiaineYhteisöt ja kokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste