Do modern social media applications suffer from feature creep? : Case YouTube
Sundell, Kalle (2024-09-16)
Do modern social media applications suffer from feature creep? : Case YouTube
(16.09.2024)
Julkaisu on tekijänoikeussäännösten alainen. Teosta voi lukea ja tulostaa henkilökohtaista käyttöä varten. Käyttö kaupallisiin tarkoituksiin on kielletty.
avoin
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2024091873679
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2024091873679
Tiivistelmä
This study was conducted to examine the prevalence of excess features in modern social media
platforms. Social media companies are constantly trying to find ways to improve their product,
impress their audience and keep them satisfied. A common approach for achieving this appears to be
the introduction of more functionality by expanding the software’s existing feature set. If these newly
introduced features are poorly adopted but remain in the software’s feature set, the software may
suffer from “creeping featurism”, more commonly known as “feature creep”. The presence of feature
creep may have many unwanted consequences, such as decreased user satisfaction, increased difficulty
in software maintenance and performance issues. This study aims to determine whether modern social
media platforms suffer from this phenomenon by using the video-sharing platform YouTube as a case
example.
Does YouTube suffer from feature creep? One way to find out is to ask directly from its end users. For
this purpose, a survey was created. In the survey, the respondents were first asked to express their
personal feelings about the platform’s current state. Then, the respondents were presented with a set of
features and asked to assess how useful they found a given feature to be. After this, another set of
features was presented asking to assess how often they engage with a given feature. The survey was
distributed across several social media platforms and a total of 44 responses were amassed.
Based on the obtained results, YouTube does not seem to suffer from feature creep in its current state
despite offering quite an extensive set of features. Users were mainly happy with the user interface and
the vast majority of features were at least seen as “good to have”. However, an interesting observation
is that a large portion of YouTube’s features appear to remain unused by the general population. This
portion is even more pronounced among those who are infrequent (non-daily) users of the platform. In
addition, an interesting recurring pattern was detected. Out of the features in the presented feature sets,
approximately 20% of features were seen as necessary, 50% as useful and 30% as unnecessary. It
remains unclear whether this pattern applies for other social media platforms as well.
platforms. Social media companies are constantly trying to find ways to improve their product,
impress their audience and keep them satisfied. A common approach for achieving this appears to be
the introduction of more functionality by expanding the software’s existing feature set. If these newly
introduced features are poorly adopted but remain in the software’s feature set, the software may
suffer from “creeping featurism”, more commonly known as “feature creep”. The presence of feature
creep may have many unwanted consequences, such as decreased user satisfaction, increased difficulty
in software maintenance and performance issues. This study aims to determine whether modern social
media platforms suffer from this phenomenon by using the video-sharing platform YouTube as a case
example.
Does YouTube suffer from feature creep? One way to find out is to ask directly from its end users. For
this purpose, a survey was created. In the survey, the respondents were first asked to express their
personal feelings about the platform’s current state. Then, the respondents were presented with a set of
features and asked to assess how useful they found a given feature to be. After this, another set of
features was presented asking to assess how often they engage with a given feature. The survey was
distributed across several social media platforms and a total of 44 responses were amassed.
Based on the obtained results, YouTube does not seem to suffer from feature creep in its current state
despite offering quite an extensive set of features. Users were mainly happy with the user interface and
the vast majority of features were at least seen as “good to have”. However, an interesting observation
is that a large portion of YouTube’s features appear to remain unused by the general population. This
portion is even more pronounced among those who are infrequent (non-daily) users of the platform. In
addition, an interesting recurring pattern was detected. Out of the features in the presented feature sets,
approximately 20% of features were seen as necessary, 50% as useful and 30% as unnecessary. It
remains unclear whether this pattern applies for other social media platforms as well.