Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä aineisto 
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Automated Protocoling of Emergency Brain MRI Using Text from Clinical Referrals

Huhtanen, Heidi J.; Nyman, Mikko J.; Karlsson, Antti; Hirvonen, Jussi

Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Automated Protocoling of Emergency Brain MRI Using Text from Clinical Referrals

Huhtanen, Heidi J.
Nyman, Mikko J.
Karlsson, Antti
Hirvonen, Jussi
Katso/Avaa
huhtanen-et-al-2025-machine-learning-and-deep-learning-models-for-automated-protocoling-of-emergency-brain-mri-using.pdf (1.431Mb)
Lataukset: 

Radiological Society of North America
doi:10.1148/ryai.230620
URI
https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/10.1148/ryai.230620
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2025082789181
Tiivistelmä

​​​​​​​Purpose To develop and evaluate machine learning and deep learning-based models for automated protocoling of emergency brain MRI scans based on clinical referral text.

Materials and Methods In this single-institution, retrospective study of 1953 emergency brain MRI referrals from January 2016 to January 2019, two neuroradiologists labeled the imaging protocol and use of contrast agent as the reference standard. Three machine learning algorithms (Naïve Bayes, support vector machine, and XGBoost) and two pretrained deep learning models (Finnish BERT and GPT-3.5) were developed to predict the MRI protocol and need for contrast agent. Each model was trained with three datasets (100% of training data, 50% of training data, and 50% + augmented training data). Prediction accuracy was assessed with test set.

Results The GPT-3.5 models trained with 100% of the training data performed best in both tasks, achieving accuracy of 84% (95% CI: 80%-88%) for the correct protocol and 91% (95% CI: 88%-94%) for contrast. BERT had an accuracy of 78% (95% CI: 74%-82%) for the protocol and 89% (95% CI: 86%-92%) for contrast. The best machine learning model in the protocol task was XGBoost (accuracy 78% [95% CI: 73%-82%]), and in the contrast agent task support vector machine and XGBoost (accuracy 88% [95% CI: 84%-91%] for both). The accuracies of two nonneuroradiologists were 80%-83% in the protocol task and 89%-91% in the contrast medium task.

Conclusion Machine learning and deep learning models demonstrated high performance in automatic protocoling emergency brain MRI scans based on text from clinical referrals. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.

Kokoelmat
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet [29335]

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Tämä kokoelma

JulkaisuajatTekijätNimekkeetAsiasanatTiedekuntaLaitosOppiaineYhteisöt ja kokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste