Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä aineisto 
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Comparison of Postoperative Complications After Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer with Antecolic Versus Retrocolic Reconstruction : A Population-Based Study

Junttila Anna; Helminen Olli; Helmiö Mika; Huhta Heikki; Jalkanen Aapo; Kallio Raija; Koivukangas Vesa; Kokkola Art; Laine Simo; Lietzen Elina; Louhimo Johanna; Meriläinen Sanna; Pohjanen Vesa-Matti; Rantanen Tuomo; Ristimäki Ari; Räsänen Jari V.; Saarnio Juha; Sihvo Eero; Toikkanen Vesa; Tyrväinen Tuula; Valtola Antti; Kauppila Joonas H.; FINEGO Group

Comparison of Postoperative Complications After Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer with Antecolic Versus Retrocolic Reconstruction : A Population-Based Study

Junttila Anna
Helminen Olli
Helmiö Mika
Huhta Heikki
Jalkanen Aapo
Kallio Raija
Koivukangas Vesa
Kokkola Art
Laine Simo
Lietzen Elina
Louhimo Johanna
Meriläinen Sanna
Pohjanen Vesa-Matti
Rantanen Tuomo
Ristimäki Ari
Räsänen Jari V.
Saarnio Juha
Sihvo Eero
Toikkanen Vesa
Tyrväinen Tuula
Valtola Antti
Kauppila Joonas H.
FINEGO Group
Katso/Avaa
s10434-024-15415-5.pdf (512.6Kb)
Lataukset: 

Springer Nature
doi:10.1245/s10434-024-15415-5
URI
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1245/s10434-024-15415-5
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2025082789790
Tiivistelmä

Background: The purpose of this study was to examine the rates of 90-day anastomotic complications and other postoperative complications after total or partial gastrectomy with antecolic versus retrocolic reconstruction in a population-based setting.

Methods: This population-based nationwide retrospective cohort study included all patients undergoing total or partial gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma in Finland in 2005-2016, with follow-up until 31 December 2019. Logistic regression provided odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of 90-day mortality. Results were adjusted for age, sex, year of the surgery, comorbidities, tumor locations, pathological stage, and neoadjuvant therapy.

Results: A total of 2063 patients having gastrectomy with antecolic (n = 814) or retrocolic (n = 1249) reconstruction were identified from the registries. The anastomotic complication rate was 3.8% with antecolic reconstruction and 5.0% with retrocolic reconstruction. Antecolic reconstruction was not associated with a higher risk of anastomotic complications compared with retrocolic reconstruction in the adjusted analysis (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.44-1.09) of the whole cohort or in the predefined subgroups. The reoperation rate was 8.2% with antecolic reconstruction and 7.7% with retrocolic reconstruction, without statistical significance. In subgroup analysis of total gastrectomy patients, the risk of major complications was lower with antecolic reconstruction compared with retrocolic reconstruction (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.45-0.86).

Conclusions: The rate of anastomotic complications did not differ after antecolic versus retrocolic reconstruction after total or partial gastrectomy. In total gastrectomies, the risk of major complications was lower after antecolic compared with retrocolic reconstruction.

Kokoelmat
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet [27094]

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Tämä kokoelma

JulkaisuajatTekijätNimekkeetAsiasanatTiedekuntaLaitosOppiaineYhteisöt ja kokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste