Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä aineisto 
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

The current state of cranioplasty in Europe : Results from a European cranioplasty survey

Naser, Paul Vincent; Tsitsopoulos, Parmenion; Zacharias, Friederike; Castaño-Leon, Ana M.; Buki, Andras; Depreitere, Bart; Van Essen, Thomas; Korhonen, Tommi K.; Mee, Harry; Hossain, Iftakher; Posti, Jussi; Lippa, Laura; Papadopoulos, Marios C.; Terpolilli, Nicole; Marklund, Niklas; Petr, Ondra; Toth, Peter; Luoto, Teemu; Krieg, Sandro M.; Unterberg, Andreas W.

The current state of cranioplasty in Europe : Results from a European cranioplasty survey

Naser, Paul Vincent
Tsitsopoulos, Parmenion
Zacharias, Friederike
Castaño-Leon, Ana M.
Buki, Andras
Depreitere, Bart
Van Essen, Thomas
Korhonen, Tommi K.
Mee, Harry
Hossain, Iftakher
Posti, Jussi
Lippa, Laura
Papadopoulos, Marios C.
Terpolilli, Nicole
Marklund, Niklas
Petr, Ondra
Toth, Peter
Luoto, Teemu
Krieg, Sandro M.
Unterberg, Andreas W.
Katso/Avaa
The current state of cranioplasty in Europe – Results from a European cranioplasty survey.pdf (3.139Mb)
Lataukset: 

Elsevier
doi:10.1016/j.bas.2025.104214
URI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2025.104214
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2025082786503
Tiivistelmä

Introduction
Cranioplasty, a surgical procedure to restore skull integrity and aesthetic contour following decompressive craniectomy, poses challenges in material selection and timing, driven by the lack of guidelines and ongoing regulatory changes.

Research question
This study aimed to provide an overview of current cranioplasty practices in Europe, explicitly addressing a potential shift towards alloplastic materials and the management of patients with concomitant hydrocephalus.

Material and methods
An online survey was conducted among European neurosurgical centers from January to March 2024, collecting data on material preferences, timing of procedures, and management strategies for cranioplasty. Descriptive and statistical analyses were performed on 110 complete responses.

Results
Respondents favored alloplastic materials over autologous bone for cranioplasty, citing regulatory constraints and reduced infection risk as primary reasons. Variability was observed in the timing of procedures and the management of patients with hydrocephalus, with most centers adopting staged approaches.
​​​​​​​
Discussion and conclusion
The shift towards alloplastic materials in cranioplasty reflects regulatory pressures rather than material-specific considerations. Despite variability in practice, our findings underscore the need for standardized guidelines and further research to optimize patient outcomes. This study provides valuable insights into current practices and highlights areas for future investigation in cranioplasty.

Kokoelmat
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet [27094]

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Tämä kokoelma

JulkaisuajatTekijätNimekkeetAsiasanatTiedekuntaLaitosOppiaineYhteisöt ja kokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste