Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä aineisto 
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Effect of different surface treatments on shear bond strength of autopolymerizing repair resin to denture base materials processed with different technologies

Gibreel, Mona; Perea-Lowery, Leila; Garoushi, Sufyan; Wada, Junichiro; Lassila, Lippo; Vallittu, Pekka

Effect of different surface treatments on shear bond strength of autopolymerizing repair resin to denture base materials processed with different technologies

Gibreel, Mona
Perea-Lowery, Leila
Garoushi, Sufyan
Wada, Junichiro
Lassila, Lippo
Vallittu, Pekka
Katso/Avaa
advpub_JPR_D_23_00149.pdf (5.067Mb)
Lataukset: 

Elsevier
doi:10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_23_00149
URI
https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_23_00149
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2025082790519
Tiivistelmä

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of chemical, mechanical, and combination surface treatments on the shear bond strength (SBS) of autopolymerizing repair resins to conventional heat-cured, computer aided design (CAD)-computer aided manufacturing (CAM) milled, and three-dimensionally (3D) printed denture base materials.

Methods: Specimens were fabricated and divided according to the surface treatment as follows: no surface treatment (control group), monomer treatment (monomer group), resin remover treatment (resin remover group), roughening with 180 FEPA grit abrasive paper followed by monomer treatment (180-grit plus monomer group), and air particle abrasion (air abrasion group). Autopolymerizing resin cylinders were attached before accelerated aging of the specimens in water at 100 °C for 16 h. The SBS was tested using a universal testing machine. Surface roughness was evaluated using a 3D optical profilometer. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and stereomicroscopy were used for surface analysis. Data was collected and analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Kruskall-Wallis tests (α = 0.05).

Results: The denture base material and surface treatment significantly affected the SBS. The milled Temp Basic Tissue demonstrated the highest SBS values across all surface treatments, whereas the two 3D-printed denture base materials exhibited the lowest SBS values.

Conclusions: The bond strength of CAD-CAM-milled denture base resins to autopolymerizing repair resins is comparable to that of heat-cured resins. Surface roughening using air particle abrasion or 180-grit carbide paper can enhance the bond strength of the autopolymerizing repair resin to 3D-printed denture base materials.

Kokoelmat
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet [29335]

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Tämä kokoelma

JulkaisuajatTekijätNimekkeetAsiasanatTiedekuntaLaitosOppiaineYhteisöt ja kokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste