Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä aineisto 
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Comparing methods for the long-term performance assessment of bifacial photovoltaic modules in Nordic conditions

Karttunen Lauri; Jouttijärvi Sami; Poskela Aapo; Palonen Heikki; Huerta Hugo; Todorović Milica; Ranta Samuli; Miettunen Kati

Comparing methods for the long-term performance assessment of bifacial photovoltaic modules in Nordic conditions

Karttunen Lauri
Jouttijärvi Sami
Poskela Aapo
Palonen Heikki
Huerta Hugo
Todorović Milica
Ranta Samuli
Miettunen Kati
Katso/Avaa
1-s2.0-S0960148123013885-main.pdf (9.448Mb)
Lataukset: 

Elsevier Ltd
doi:10.1016/j.renene.2023.119473
URI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.119473
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2025082790565
Tiivistelmä

The main objective of this study is to discover which performance loss rate (PLR) calculation methods provide the most reliable results for vertical bifacial photovoltaics (VBPV) in Nordic conditions. For this purpose, over 1600 filter-metric-aggregation-model combinations for PLR calculation are compared. Accurate determination of PLR is crucial for estimating the economic profitability of a PV system, but standardized methodology is lacking as is the understanding on how the common PLR calculation frameworks perform for both VBPV technology and Nordic climatic region. Here, four-year, minute-resolution datasets from adjacent VBPV modules and a weather station in Turku, Finland (60◦N) are used. After removing crude outliers, a benchmark PLR of − 1.46 ± 0.03 %/year was obtained by averaging the remaining over 1200 filter-metric-aggregation-model combinations. The year-on-year method with a daily/weekly aggregated temperature- and irradiance-corrected performance model was found robust and reliable to Nordic high seasonality. In contrast, several commonly used methods, such as the PVUSA model, produced unrealistic results. Unexpectedly, temperature correction increased the seasonal pattern of the performance ratio, and PLR varied with irradiance conditions and between the front and rear sides of the module. This work expands the best practices of PLR calculation to complement the development of global PLR calculation standards.

Kokoelmat
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet [27094]

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Tämä kokoelma

JulkaisuajatTekijätNimekkeetAsiasanatTiedekuntaLaitosOppiaineYhteisöt ja kokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste