Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä aineisto 
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Factors affecting the performance of a novel artificial intelligence-based coronary computed tomography-derived ischaemia algorithm

Kiatkittikul, Peerapon; Maaniitty, Teemu; Bär, Sarah; Nabeta, Takeru; Bax, Jeroen J; Saraste, Antti; Knuuti, Juhani

Factors affecting the performance of a novel artificial intelligence-based coronary computed tomography-derived ischaemia algorithm

Kiatkittikul, Peerapon
Maaniitty, Teemu
Bär, Sarah
Nabeta, Takeru
Bax, Jeroen J
Saraste, Antti
Knuuti, Juhani
Katso/Avaa
qyaf033.pdf (721.6Kb)
Lataukset: 

Oxford University Press (OUP)
doi:10.1093/ehjimp/qyaf033
URI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjimp/qyaf033
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2025082786653
Tiivistelmä

Aims: AI-QCTischaemia is an FDA-cleared novel artificial intelligence-guided method that utilizes features from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) to predict myocardial ischaemia.

Objective: To identify factors associated with discrepancy between AI-QCTischaemia and positron emission tomography (PET) perfusion.

Methods and results: Six hundred and sixty-two patients with suspected obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) on CCTA and undergoing [15O]H2O PET were analysed using AI-QCTischaemia. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with discrepancy. Perfusion homogeneity was measured by relative flow reserve. A total of 209 (32%) patients showed discrepancies: 62 (9%) exhibited normal AI-QCTischaemia but abnormal perfusion (false negative AI-QCTischaemia), whereas 147 (22%) had abnormal AI-QCTischaemia despite normal perfusion (false positive AI-QCTischaemia). False positive AI-QCTischaemia patients (vs. true positive) were more often females, older, with less typical angina, and less advanced CAD. In multivariable analysis, typical angina [OR 95% CI: 1.796 (1.015-3.179), P = 0.044], diameter stenosis per 1% increase [1.058 (1.036-1.080), P < 0.001], and percent atheroma volume per 1% increase [1.103 (1.051-1.158), P < 0.001] significantly predicted true positive, while age was inversely associated [0.955 (0.923-0.989), P = 0.010]. False-negative AI-QCTischaemia patients (vs. true negative) were more often males, smokers, with less good CCTA image quality, and more advanced CAD. However, none was significant in multivariable analysis. Furthermore, false-negative AI-QCTischaemia showed more homogenously reduced perfusion by relative flow reserve compared to true positive (median ± IQR: 0.68 ± 0.15 vs. 0.56 ± 0.23, P < 0.001) and 21 (34%) of false negative showed globally reduced perfusion.

Conclusion: For abnormal AI-QCTischaemia, younger age, typical angina, more severe stenosis, and more extensive atherosclerosis predicted abnormal PET perfusion. With false negative AI-QCTischaemia, perfusion abnormalities were partly explained by microvascular disease.

Keywords: AI-QCTischaemia; coronary artery disease; coronary computed tomography angiography; oxygen-15 water; positron emission tomography

Kokoelmat
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet [29335]

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Tämä kokoelma

JulkaisuajatTekijätNimekkeetAsiasanatTiedekuntaLaitosOppiaineYhteisöt ja kokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste