Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä aineisto 
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Low rate of reoperations after acute type A aortic dissection repair from The Nordic Consortium Registry

Emily Pan; Tomas Gudbjartsson; Anders Ahlsson; Simon Fuglsang; Arnar Geirsson; Emma C. Hansson; Vibeke Hjortdal; Anders Jeppsson; Kati Järvelä; Ari Mennander; Shahab Nozohoor; Christian Olsson; Anders Wickbom; Igor Zindovic; Jarmo Gunn

Low rate of reoperations after acute type A aortic dissection repair from The Nordic Consortium Registry

Emily Pan
Tomas Gudbjartsson
Anders Ahlsson
Simon Fuglsang
Arnar Geirsson
Emma C. Hansson
Vibeke Hjortdal
Anders Jeppsson
Kati Järvelä
Ari Mennander
Shahab Nozohoor
Christian Olsson
Anders Wickbom
Igor Zindovic
Jarmo Gunn
Katso/Avaa
Publisher´s PDF (1.081Mb)
Lataukset: 

Mosby Inc.
doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.03.144
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2021042719303
Tiivistelmä

Objectives
To describe the relationship between the extent of primary aortic repair and the incidence of reoperations after surgery for type A aortic dissection.
Methods
A retrospective cohort of 1159 patients treated for type A aortic dissection at eight Nordic low- to medium-sized cardiothoracic centers from 2005 to 2014. Data were gathered from patient records and national registries. Patients were separately divided into 3 groups according to the distal anastomoses technique (ascending aorta [n = 791], hemiarch [n = 247], and total arch [n = 66]), and into 2 groups for proximal repair (aortic root replacement [n = 285] and supracoronary repair [n = 832]). Freedom from reoperation was estimated with cumulative incidence survival and Fine-Gray competing risk regression model was used to identify independent risk factors for reoperation.
Results
The median follow-up was 2.7 years (range, 0-10 years). Altogether 51 out of 911 patients underwent reoperation. Freedom from distal reoperation at 5 years was 96.9%, with no significant difference between the groups (P = .22). Freedom from proximal reoperation at 5 years was 97.8%, with no difference between the groups (P = .84). Neither DeBakey classification nor the extent of proximal or distal repair predicted freedom from a later reoperation. The only independent risk factor associated with a later proximal reoperation was a history of connective tissue disease.
Conclusions
Type A aortic dissection repair in low- to medium-volume centers was associated with a low reoperation rate and satisfactory midterm survival. The extent of the primary repair had no significant influence on reoperation rate or midterm survival.

Kokoelmat
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet [27094]

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Tämä kokoelma

JulkaisuajatTekijätNimekkeetAsiasanatTiedekuntaLaitosOppiaineYhteisöt ja kokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste