Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä aineisto 
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Euclid preparation XXXVI. Modelling the weak lensing angular power spectrum

Deshpande A; Kitching T; Hall A; Brown M; Aghanim N; Amendola L; Andreon S; Auricchio N; Baldi M; Bardelli S; Bender R; Bonino D; Branchini E; Brescia M; Brinchmann J; Camera S; Candini G; Capobianco V; Carbone C; Cardone V; Carretero J; Casas S; Castander F; Castellano M; Cavuoti S; Cimatti A; Cledassou R; Congedo G; Conselice C; Conversi L; Corcione L; Courbin F; Courtois H; Cropper M; Da Silva A; Degaudenzi H; Douspis M; Dubath F; Duncan C; Dupac X; Farina M; Farrens S; Ferriol S; Fosalba P; Frailis M; Franceschi E; Fumana M; Galeotta S; Garilli B; Gillis B; Giocoli C; Grazian A; Grupp F; Haugan S; Hoekstra H; Holmes W; Hornstrup A; Hudelot P; Jahnke K; Keihänen E; Kermiche S; Kilbinger M; Kunz M; Kurki-Suonio H; Ligori S; Lilje P; Lindholm V; Lloro I; Maiorano E; Mansutti O; Marggraf O; Markovic K; Martinet N; Marulli F; Massey R; Mei S; Mellier Y; Meneghetti M; Meylan G; Moscardini L; Niemi S; Nightingale J; Nutma T; Padilla C; Paltani S; Pasian F; Pedersen K; Pettorino V; Pires S; Polenta G; Pollack J; Poncet M; Popa L; Raison F; Renzi A; Rhodes J; Riccio G; Romelli E; Roncarelli M; Rossetti E; Saglia R; Sapone D; Sartoris B; Schneider P; Schrabback T; Secroun A; Seidel G; Serrano S; Sirignano C; Sirri G; Stanco L; Tallada-Crespí P; Taylor A; Tereno I; Toledo-Moreo R; Torradeflot F; Tutusaus I; Valentijn E; Valenziano L; Vassallo T; Wang Y; Weller J; Zacchei A; Zamorani G; Zoubian J; Zucca E; Boucaud A; Bozzo E; Colodro-Conde C; Di Ferdinando D; Fabbian G; Graciá-Carpio J; Mauri N; Scottez V; Tenti M; Akrami Y; Baccigalupi C; Balaguera-Antolínez A; Ballardini M; Bernardeau F; Biviano A; Blanchard A; Borlaff A; Burigana C; Cabanac R; Cappi A; Carvalho C; Castignani G; Castro T; Chambers K; Cooray A; Coupon J; Davini S; De La Torre S; De Lucia G; Desprez G; Dole H; Escartin J; Escoffier S; Ferrero I; Finelli F; Garcia-Bellido J; George K; Giacomini F; Gozaliasl G; Hildebrandt H; Kajava J; Kansal V; Kirkpatrick C; Legrand L; Loureiro A; MacIas-Perez J; Magliocchetti M; Mainetti G; Maoli R; Martinelli M; Martins C; Matthew S; Maurin L; Metcalf R; Monaco P; Morgante G; Nadathur S; Nucita A; Patrizii L; Peel A; Pöntinen M; Popa V; Porciani C; Potter D; Pourtsidou A; Reimberg P; Sakr Z; Sánchez A; Schneider A; Sefusatti E; Sereno M; Shulevski A; Spurio Mancini A; Steinwagner J; Teyssier R; Viel M; Zinchenko I; Fleury P

Euclid preparation XXXVI. Modelling the weak lensing angular power spectrum

Deshpande A
Kitching T
Hall A
Brown M
Aghanim N
Amendola L
Andreon S
Auricchio N
Baldi M
Bardelli S
Bender R
Bonino D
Branchini E
Brescia M
Brinchmann J
Camera S
Candini G
Capobianco V
Carbone C
Cardone V
Carretero J
Casas S
Castander F
Castellano M
Cavuoti S
Cimatti A
Cledassou R
Congedo G
Conselice C
Conversi L
Corcione L
Courbin F
Courtois H
Cropper M
Da Silva A
Degaudenzi H
Douspis M
Dubath F
Duncan C
Dupac X
Farina M
Farrens S
Ferriol S
Fosalba P
Frailis M
Franceschi E
Fumana M
Galeotta S
Garilli B
Gillis B
Giocoli C
Grazian A
Grupp F
Haugan S
Hoekstra H
Holmes W
Hornstrup A
Hudelot P
Jahnke K
Keihänen E
Kermiche S
Kilbinger M
Kunz M
Kurki-Suonio H
Ligori S
Lilje P
Lindholm V
Lloro I
Maiorano E
Mansutti O
Marggraf O
Markovic K
Martinet N
Marulli F
Massey R
Mei S
Mellier Y
Meneghetti M
Meylan G
Moscardini L
Niemi S
Nightingale J
Nutma T
Padilla C
Paltani S
Pasian F
Pedersen K
Pettorino V
Pires S
Polenta G
Pollack J
Poncet M
Popa L
Raison F
Renzi A
Rhodes J
Riccio G
Romelli E
Roncarelli M
Rossetti E
Saglia R
Sapone D
Sartoris B
Schneider P
Schrabback T
Secroun A
Seidel G
Serrano S
Sirignano C
Sirri G
Stanco L
Tallada-Crespí P
Taylor A
Tereno I
Toledo-Moreo R
Torradeflot F
Tutusaus I
Valentijn E
Valenziano L
Vassallo T
Wang Y
Weller J
Zacchei A
Zamorani G
Zoubian J
Zucca E
Boucaud A
Bozzo E
Colodro-Conde C
Di Ferdinando D
Fabbian G
Graciá-Carpio J
Mauri N
Scottez V
Tenti M
Akrami Y
Baccigalupi C
Balaguera-Antolínez A
Ballardini M
Bernardeau F
Biviano A
Blanchard A
Borlaff A
Burigana C
Cabanac R
Cappi A
Carvalho C
Castignani G
Castro T
Chambers K
Cooray A
Coupon J
Davini S
De La Torre S
De Lucia G
Desprez G
Dole H
Escartin J
Escoffier S
Ferrero I
Finelli F
Garcia-Bellido J
George K
Giacomini F
Gozaliasl G
Hildebrandt H
Kajava J
Kansal V
Kirkpatrick C
Legrand L
Loureiro A
MacIas-Perez J
Magliocchetti M
Mainetti G
Maoli R
Martinelli M
Martins C
Matthew S
Maurin L
Metcalf R
Monaco P
Morgante G
Nadathur S
Nucita A
Patrizii L
Peel A
Pöntinen M
Popa V
Porciani C
Potter D
Pourtsidou A
Reimberg P
Sakr Z
Sánchez A
Schneider A
Sefusatti E
Sereno M
Shulevski A
Spurio Mancini A
Steinwagner J
Teyssier R
Viel M
Zinchenko I
Fleury P
Katso/Avaa
aa46110-23.pdf (2.739Mb)
Lataukset: 

EDP Sciences
doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346110
URI
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202346110
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2025082791107
Tiivistelmä
This work considers which higher order modeling effects on the cosmic shear angular power spectra must be taken into account for Euclid. We identified the relevant terms and quantified their individual and cumulative impact on the cosmological parameter inferences from Euclid. We computed the values of these higher order effects using analytic expressions and calculated the impact on cosmological parameter estimations using the Fisher matrix formalism. We reviewed 24 effects and determined the ones that potentially need to be accounted for, namely: the reduced shear approximation, magnification bias, source-lens clustering, source obscuration, local Universe effects, and the flat Universe assumption. After computing these effects explicitly and calculating their cosmological parameter biases, using a maximum multipole of l = 5000, we find that the magnification bias, source-lens clustering, source obscuration, and local Universe terms individually produce significant (> 0.25σ) cosmological biases in one or more parameters; accordingly, these effects must be accounted for and warrant further investigation. In total, we find biases in Ωm, Ωb, h, and σ 8 of 0.73σ, 0.28σ, 0.25σ, and -0.79σ, respectively, for the flat λCDM. For the w0waCDM case, we found biases in Ωm, Ωb, h, ns, σg, and wa of 1.49σ, 0.35σ, -1.36σ, 1.31σ, -0.84σ, and -0.35σ, respectively. These are increased relative to the ΛCDM due to additional degeneracies as a function of redshift and scale. © 2024 EDP Sciences. All rights reserved.
Kokoelmat
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet [27094]

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Tämä kokoelma

JulkaisuajatTekijätNimekkeetAsiasanatTiedekuntaLaitosOppiaineYhteisöt ja kokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste