Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä aineisto 
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

The Association of Concurrent Psychotic Disorders with Outcomes of Opioid Agonist Therapy in Individuals with Opioid Use Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

Li, Yangyang; Niemelä, Solja; Denissoff, Alexander

The Association of Concurrent Psychotic Disorders with Outcomes of Opioid Agonist Therapy in Individuals with Opioid Use Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

Li, Yangyang
Niemelä, Solja
Denissoff, Alexander
Katso/Avaa
s40429-025-00642-x.pdf (1.800Mb)
Lataukset: 

Springer Science and Business Media LLC
doi:10.1007/s40429-025-00642-x
URI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-025-00642-x
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2025082787210
Tiivistelmä

Purpose of Review
This systematic review examines the association between co-occurring psychotic disorders and Opioid Agonist Therapy (OAT) outcomes in Opioid Use Disorder (OUD).

Recent Findings
We searched eight databases and reference lists up to March 20, 2024, for observational studies comparing OAT outcomes in patients with OUD with and without psychotic disorders. 21 studies with 17,623 participants were included, all exhibiting a low to moderate overall risk of bias. The results suggested that patients with OUD and psychotic disorders had significantly poorer OAT retention than those with OUD without psychotic disorders [odds ratio (OR) = 0.65; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.57–0.74; P < 0.05]. Subgroup analysis identified study period as a source of heterogeneity, with no significant publication bias. No significant evidence suggested that co-occurring psychotic disorders were associated with illicit drug use, including opioids (OR = 1.05; 95% CI: 0.50–2.23; P = 0.90), amphetamines [relative risk (RR) = 1.09; 95% CI: 0.45–2.67; P = 0.84], cannabis (OR = 1.48; 95% CI: 0.99–2.21; P = 0.06), cocaine (RR = 1.19; 95% CI: 0.43–3.25; P = 0.74), and polydrug use (OR = 1.05; 95% CI: 0.40–2.72; P = 0.93). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of all pooled results except for cannabis use.

Summary
Analyzing data from 21 studies involving 17,623 participants, we found that patients with OUD and psychotic disorders had significantly poorer OAT retention compared to those with OUD without psychotic disorders. However, no significant association was found between co-occurring psychotic disorders and illicit drug use.

Kokoelmat
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet [27094]

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Tämä kokoelma

JulkaisuajatTekijätNimekkeetAsiasanatTiedekuntaLaitosOppiaineYhteisöt ja kokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste