Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä aineisto 
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Giant cell arteritis in Finland from 2010 to 2020: incidence, developing diagnostic methods and disease presentation

Kivitalo, Lauri; Taimen, Kirsi; Sokka-Isler, Tuulikki; Kerola, Anne; Rautavaara, Joonas; Pirilä, Laura; Kauppi, Markku; Malila, Joel; Haara, Laura; Ryyppö, Laura; Kotijärvi, Taina; Saarenketo, Panu; Saarivaara, Hannu; Siltanen, Juho; Helminen, Mika; Rutanen, Jarno; Isomäki, Pia

Giant cell arteritis in Finland from 2010 to 2020: incidence, developing diagnostic methods and disease presentation

Kivitalo, Lauri
Taimen, Kirsi
Sokka-Isler, Tuulikki
Kerola, Anne
Rautavaara, Joonas
Pirilä, Laura
Kauppi, Markku
Malila, Joel
Haara, Laura
Ryyppö, Laura
Kotijärvi, Taina
Saarenketo, Panu
Saarivaara, Hannu
Siltanen, Juho
Helminen, Mika
Rutanen, Jarno
Isomäki, Pia
Katso/Avaa
Taimen_etal_giant_cell_2025.pdf (1.222Mb)
Lataukset: 

Oxford University Press (OUP)
doi:10.1093/rap/rkaf055
URI
https://academic.oup.com/rheumap/article/9/2/rkaf055/8132960#522694033
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2025082791122
Tiivistelmä

Objectives
To study the annual incidence, diagnostic methods used and clinical presentation of giant cell arteritis (GCA) over time in Finland.

Methods
Newly diagnosed GCA patients from 2010 to 2020 were retrospectively identified from four healthcare districts in Finland. Medical records were reviewed and data on incidence, diagnostic methods, phenotype [cranial vs large vessel (LV)-GCA] and clinical presentation were analysed.

Results
We identified 602 newly diagnosed GCA patients. The annual incidence was 9.0 cases/100 000 persons (95% CI 8.3, 9.7) ≥50 years of age and was significantly higher in the period 2016–2020 compared with the period 2010–2015 [11.3 (95% CI 10.1, 12.5) vs 7.0 (95% CI 6.2, 7.9), P < 0.001]. Imaging- or biopsy-confirmed diagnosis was recorded in 75% of GCA patients, while 25% had a clinical diagnosis. The proportion of imaging- or biopsy-confirmed diagnoses increased over time [64.7% (2010–2015) vs 82.2% (2016–2020)] while that of clinical diagnoses decreased. The use of imaging methods increased while the use of temporal artery biopsies decreased between the two time periods. LV-GCA was discovered more often in the period 2016–2020 when compared with 2010–2015 (34.0% vs 19.3% of patients).

Conclusion
The incidence of GCA increased during the study period, as well as the proportion of imaging- or biopsy-confirmed diagnoses, probably due to more frequent use of advanced imaging methods. Additionally, patients with LV-GCA were more commonly identified.

Kokoelmat
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet [27094]

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Tämä kokoelma

JulkaisuajatTekijätNimekkeetAsiasanatTiedekuntaLaitosOppiaineYhteisöt ja kokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste