Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä aineisto 
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Nordic survey showed wide variation in discharge practices for very preterm infants

Arwehed Sofia; Axelin Anna; Björklund Lars J.; Blomqvist Ylva Thernström; Heiring Christian; Jonsson Baldvin; Klingenberg Claus; Metsäranta Marjo; Ågren Johan; Lehtonen Liisa

Nordic survey showed wide variation in discharge practices for very preterm infants

Arwehed Sofia
Axelin Anna
Björklund Lars J.
Blomqvist Ylva Thernström
Heiring Christian
Jonsson Baldvin
Klingenberg Claus
Metsäranta Marjo
Ågren Johan
Lehtonen Liisa
Katso/Avaa
Acta Paediatrica - 2023 - Arwehed.pdf (854.1Kb)
Lataukset: 

WILEY
doi:10.1111/apa.16934
URI
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apa.16934
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2025082787562
Tiivistelmä

Aim

We aimed to describe clinical practices and criteria for discharge of very preterm infants in Nordic neonatal units.

Methods

Medical directors of all 89 level-2 and level-3 units in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden were invited by e-mail to complete a web-based multiple-choice survey with the option to make additional free-text comments.

Results

We received responses from 83/89 units (93%). In all responding units, discharge readiness was based mainly on clinical assessment with varying criteria. In addition, 36% used formal tests of cardiorespiratory stability and 59% used criteria related to infant weight or growth. For discharge with feeding tube, parental ability to speak the national language or English was mandatory in 45% of units, with large variation among countries. Post-discharge home visits and video-consultations were provided by 59% and 51%, respectively. In 54% of units, parental preparation for discharge were not initiated until the last two weeks of hospital stay.

Conclusion

Discharge readiness was based mainly on clinical assessment, with criteria varying among units despite similar population characteristics and care structures. This variation indicates a lack of evidence base and may unnecessarily delay discharge; further studies of this matter are needed. Earlier parental preparation and use of interpreters might facilitate earlier discharge.

Kokoelmat
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet [27094]

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Tämä kokoelma

JulkaisuajatTekijätNimekkeetAsiasanatTiedekuntaLaitosOppiaineYhteisöt ja kokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste