Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä aineisto 
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Online training to improve evidence-based leadership competencies among nurse leaders in China : a feasibility randomised controlled trial

Hu, Shuang; Chen, Wenjun; Satamo, Maija; Löyttyniemi, Eliisa; Yang, Min; Liu, Gaoming; Chen, Jiarui; Tang, Yao; Varpula, Jaakko; Li, Xianhong; Välimäki, Maritta

Online training to improve evidence-based leadership competencies among nurse leaders in China : a feasibility randomised controlled trial

Hu, Shuang
Chen, Wenjun
Satamo, Maija
Löyttyniemi, Eliisa
Yang, Min
Liu, Gaoming
Chen, Jiarui
Tang, Yao
Varpula, Jaakko
Li, Xianhong
Välimäki, Maritta
Katso/Avaa
e088386.full.pdf (409.5Kb)
Lataukset: 

BMJ
doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088386
URI
http://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088386
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2025082787685
Tiivistelmä

Objective To evaluate the feasibility of an online evidence-based leadership training programme for nurse leaders and its potential effectiveness in improving nurse leaders’ evidence-based leadership competencies.

Design This is a two-arm, parallel, feasibility randomised controlled trial.

Methods We screened all 160 nurse leaders from two Chinese hospitals. Eligible participants who gave their informed consent were randomly assigned to either an evidence-based leadership training group or a conventional online training group at each site and received a 7-month intervention. Pre-test and post-test assessments gauged feasibility and potential effectiveness. Descriptive and inferential statistics were employed for data analysis.

Results Of the 160 screened participants, 119 (74%) were assigned to the intervention group (n=59, 50%) or active control group (n=60, 50%). In the intervention group, the number of participant logins in the modules ranged from 21 (36%) to 58 (98%), while in the control group, it ranged from 20 (33%) to 57 (95%). Participants in the intervention group (n=59) completed 42% of the 531 assigned tasks, while the control group (n=60) completed 41% of their 540 assigned tasks. Regarding course task adherence, participants in the intervention group returned 3.8 (SD=3.2) tasks (out of 9 tasks), while the control group returned 3.7 (SD=3.5) tasks (out of 9 tasks). A total of 22 (18%) out of 119 participants dropped out of the study, with 9 (15%) out of 59 from the intervention group and 13 (22%) out of 60 from the control group.

Conclusions While the intervention demonstrated a degree of feasibility, measures can still be taken to improve intervention acceptability, course adherence and course task adherence. A full and powered randomised controlled trial is needed to test the intervention’s effectiveness and to ensure the feasibility of the study in clinical settings.

Trail registration number ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT05244499.

Kokoelmat
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet [27094]

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Tämä kokoelma

JulkaisuajatTekijätNimekkeetAsiasanatTiedekuntaLaitosOppiaineYhteisöt ja kokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste