Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä aineisto 
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Engagement with patients’ sexual problems: a comparative study among general practitioners and obstetrician-gynecologists

Aromaa, Anna; Kero, Katja; Manninen, Sanna-Mari; Vahlberg, Tero; Polo-Kantola, Päivi

Engagement with patients’ sexual problems: a comparative study among general practitioners and obstetrician-gynecologists

Aromaa, Anna
Kero, Katja
Manninen, Sanna-Mari
Vahlberg, Tero
Polo-Kantola, Päivi
Katso/Avaa
engagement_with_patients__sexual_problems__a.450.pdf (479.3Kb)
Lataukset: 

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
doi:10.1097/GME.0000000000002551
URI
https://doi.org/10.1097/gme.0000000000002551
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2025082787712
Tiivistelmä

Objectives: Even though good sexual health is an important part of well-being, the evaluation of patients' sexual problems is not necessarily routine for physicians. We compared engagement (attitudes, barriers to bringing up, and practice patterns) with patients' sexual problems among general practitioners (GPs) and obstetrician-gynecologists (OB/GYNs) with special regard for the sex and age of the physician.

Methods: A web-based questionnaire was used for data collection from 2 samples of physicians. The completed questionnaires from 402 GPs and 299 OB/GYNs were eligible for analysis. In the statistical analysis, the GPs were compared with the OB/GYNs as entire groups with multivariable binary logistic regression adjusted for sex and age. In addition, interaction and subgroup analysis by sex and age groups were both carried out.

Results: Both GPs and OB/GYNs considered treating sexual problems to be an important health care practice. However, compared with the OB/GYNs, the GPs were less likely to inquire about sexual problems during general medical history-taking [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.23, 95% CI: 0.16-0.33, P < 0.0001] and more likely to consider diagnosing female sexual problems as being difficult (aOR: 2.44, 95% CI: 1.73-3.44, P < 0.0001). Compared with the OB/GYNs, the GPs were more likely to report having barriers - for example, "shortness of the appointment time"(aOR: 2.36, 95% CI: 1.53-3.63, P < 0.0001), "personal attitudes and beliefs"(aOR: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.41-3.67, P = 0.001), and "lack of knowledge about sexual medicine"(aOR: 2.05, 95% CI: 1.36-3.10, P = 0.001).

Conclusions: Both GPs and OB/GYNs considered the treatment of sexual problems to be an important health care practice; however, the engagement with patients' sexual problems among GPs was less structured.

Kokoelmat
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet [27094]

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Tämä kokoelma

JulkaisuajatTekijätNimekkeetAsiasanatTiedekuntaLaitosOppiaineYhteisöt ja kokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste