Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä aineisto 
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Comparable results for the Femoral Neck System and three-screw fixation in femoral neck fracture treatment

Honkanen, Jukka; Forsbacka, Nora; Strengell, Ida; Laaksonen, Inari; Mäkelä, Keijo; Koivisto, Mari; Huovinen, Ville; Ekman, Elina

Comparable results for the Femoral Neck System and three-screw fixation in femoral neck fracture treatment

Honkanen, Jukka
Forsbacka, Nora
Strengell, Ida
Laaksonen, Inari
Mäkelä, Keijo
Koivisto, Mari
Huovinen, Ville
Ekman, Elina
Katso/Avaa
comparable_results_for_the_femoral_neck_system_and.4.pdf (290.1Kb)
Lataukset: 

Ovid
doi:10.1097/OI9.0000000000000351
URI
https://doi.org/10.1097/oi9.0000000000000351
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2025082791707
Tiivistelmä

Objectives: 

To report outcomes of femoral neck fractures (FNFs) treated with Femoral Neck System (FNS) and to compare the risks of later conversion to arthroplasty for FNS and fixation with cannulated screws (CNSs).

Design: 

A retrospective study.

Setting: 

A single-center study (Turku University Hospital, Finland).

Patients: 

Data on 51 patients with FNFs treated with FNS between January 1, 2019, and May 31, 2021, were retrospectively reviewed. In addition, data on 301 patients treated with cannulated screws were collected and analyzed in a previous study.

Intervention: 

Patients with FNFs underwent osteosynthesis with FNS.

Main Outcome Measurements: 

Patients' preoperative and postoperative radiographs were analyzed and measured to determine preoperative displacement, preoperative posterior tilt, and quality of reduction. Later conversion to arthroplasty and other reoperations were recorded. The risk of later conversion to arthroplasty was compared between the FNS group and CNS group.

Results: 

The overall reoperation rate in the FNS group was 20%, and 16% of the patients treated with FNS underwent later conversion to arthroplasty. In the multivariate analysis, age, sex, and fracture displacement were not associated with increased risk of later conversion to arthroplasty. In comparison with fixation with cannulated screws, there was no statistically significant difference in the probability of later conversion to arthroplasty between the groups.

Conclusion: 

FNS seems to have a comparable reoperation rate and conversion-to-arthroplasty rate compared with the gold standard treatment.

Kokoelmat
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet [27094]

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Tämä kokoelma

JulkaisuajatTekijätNimekkeetAsiasanatTiedekuntaLaitosOppiaineYhteisöt ja kokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste