Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä aineisto 
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Functioning of post-COVID-19 patients: a cross-sectional study at the outpatient clinic for long-term effects

Stålnacke, Sanna; Liira, Helena; Vangelova-Korpinen, Velina; Virrantaus, Hélène; Kanerva, Mari; Kvarnström, Kirsi; Sainio, Markku; Malmivaara, Antti; Vuokko, Aki; Varonen, Mikko; Venäläinen, Mikko; Arokoski, Jari

Functioning of post-COVID-19 patients: a cross-sectional study at the outpatient clinic for long-term effects

Stålnacke, Sanna
Liira, Helena
Vangelova-Korpinen, Velina
Virrantaus, Hélène
Kanerva, Mari
Kvarnström, Kirsi
Sainio, Markku
Malmivaara, Antti
Vuokko, Aki
Varonen, Mikko
Venäläinen, Mikko
Arokoski, Jari
Katso/Avaa
Functioning of post-COVID-19 patients a cross-sectional study at the outpatient clinic for long-term effects.pdf (1.358Mb)
Lataukset: 

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
doi:10.1080/02813432.2024.2410986
URI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2024.2410986
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2025082791881
Tiivistelmä

Background: After COVID-19 infection, long-term impacts on functioning may occur. We studied the functioning of patients with post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) and compared them to controls without PCC.

Methods: This cross-sectional study consisted of 442 patients with PCC referred to rehabilitation at the Helsinki University Hospital (HUS) Outpatient Clinic for the Long-Term Effects of COVID-19, and 198 controls without PCC. Functioning was assessed with a questionnaire including WHODAS 2.0. Patients underwent physical testing including a hand grip strength test (HGST) and a 6-minute walking test (6MWT). Lifestyle was assessed by questionnaire and comorbidities were collected as ICD-10 codes from the HUS Data Lake on the HUS Acamedic platform.

Results: The WHODAS 2.0 average total score was 34 (SD 18) (moderate functional limitation) for patients with PCC and 6 (SD 8) (normal or mild limitation) for the controls. The disability was higher in all aspects of WHODAS 2.0 in patients with PCC. Bivariate binomial and multivariable regression analyses showed that the presence of comorbidities, anxiety, depression, and smoking predicted a WHODAS 2.0 score of 24 (moderate functional limitation) or above in the PCC group. The average 6MWT distance was 435 m (SD 98 m) in patients with PCC and 627 m (SD 70 m) in controls. HGST measurements showed no significant differences from controls.

Conclusions: In conclusion, patients with PCC had significantly reduced functioning based on WHODAS 2.0 scores and the 6MWT results. Comorbidities, anxiety, depression, and smoking were associated with moderate or severe limitations in functioning. Findings support that PCC is multifactorial and requires a holistic approach to rehabilitation.

Kokoelmat
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet [27094]

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Tämä kokoelma

JulkaisuajatTekijätNimekkeetAsiasanatTiedekuntaLaitosOppiaineYhteisöt ja kokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste