Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä aineisto 
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Impact of newly diagnosed extramedullary myeloma on outcome after first autograft followed by maintenance: A CMWP-EBMT study

Gagelmann Nico; Eikema Dirk-Jan; Koster Linda; Netelenbos Tanja; McDonald Andrew; Stoppa Anne-Marie; Fenk Roland; Anagnostopoulos Achilles; van Gorkom Gwendolyn; Deconinck Eric; Bulabois Claude-Eric; Delforge Michel; Bunjes Donald; Arcese William; Reményi Péter; Itälä-Remes Maija; Thurner Lorenz; Bolaman Ali Zahit; Nabil Yafour; Lund J.; Labussière-Wallet Hélène; Hayden Patrick J.; Beksac Meral; Schönland Stefan; Yakoub-Agha Ibrahim

Impact of newly diagnosed extramedullary myeloma on outcome after first autograft followed by maintenance: A CMWP-EBMT study

Gagelmann Nico
Eikema Dirk-Jan
Koster Linda
Netelenbos Tanja
McDonald Andrew
Stoppa Anne-Marie
Fenk Roland
Anagnostopoulos Achilles
van Gorkom Gwendolyn
Deconinck Eric
Bulabois Claude-Eric
Delforge Michel
Bunjes Donald
Arcese William
Reményi Péter
Itälä-Remes Maija
Thurner Lorenz
Bolaman Ali Zahit
Nabil Yafour
Lund J.
Labussière-Wallet Hélène
Hayden Patrick J.
Beksac Meral
Schönland Stefan
Yakoub-Agha Ibrahim
Katso/Avaa
Itälä-RemesEtAl2023ImpactOfNewlyDiagnosedExtramedullaryMyeloma.pdf (1.319Mb)
Lataukset: 

John Wiley and Sons Inc
doi:10.1111/ejh.13981
URI
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejh.13981
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2023053049481
Tiivistelmä

Background: No adequate data exist on the impact of multiple myeloma (MM) with extramedullary disease (EMD) after autograft and maintenance therapy.
Methods: We identified 808 patients with newly diagnosed MM who received first autograft, of whom 107 had EMD (83 paraskeletal and 24 organ involvement), and who had been reported to the EBMT registry December 2018. Distribution according to type of involvement was similar between the treatment groups (p = .69). For EMD, 46 (40%) received thalidomide, 59 (51%) lenalidomide, and 11 (10%) bortezomib.
Results: The median follow-up from maintenance start was 44 months. Three-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 52% (48%–57%) for no EMD, 56% (44%–69%) for paraskeletal involvement, and 45% (22%–68%) for organ involvement (p = .146). Early PFS (within first year) appeared to be significantly worse for organ involvement (hazard ratio, 3.40), while no significant influence was found after first year from maintenance start. Three-year overall survival (OS) was 81% (77%–84%), 88% (80%–96%), and 68% (47%–89%; p = .064), respectively. With thalidomide as reference, lenalidomide was significantly associated with better PFS and OS, whereas bortezomib appeared to improve outcome specifically in EMD.
Conclusion: Lenalidomide maintenance is standard of care for MM without EMD, whereas extramedullary organ involvement remains a significant risk factor for worse outcome, especially for early events after maintenance start.

Kokoelmat
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet [27094]

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Tämä kokoelma

JulkaisuajatTekijätNimekkeetAsiasanatTiedekuntaLaitosOppiaineYhteisöt ja kokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste