Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä aineisto 
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

The Accuracy of the CBCT‐Based 3‐Dimensional Replica of the Donor Tooth in Autotransplantation

Juslin, Jessica; Teerijoki‐Oksa, Tuija; Jääsaari, Päivi; Ekholm, Marja; Vallittu, Pekka; Lassila, Lippo; Thorén, Hanna

The Accuracy of the CBCT‐Based 3‐Dimensional Replica of the Donor Tooth in Autotransplantation

Juslin, Jessica
Teerijoki‐Oksa, Tuija
Jääsaari, Päivi
Ekholm, Marja
Vallittu, Pekka
Lassila, Lippo
Thorén, Hanna
Katso/Avaa
Clinical Exp Dental Res - 2024 - Juslin - The Accuracy of the CBCT‐Based 3‐Dimensional Replica of the Donor Tooth in.pdf (769.5Kb)
Lataukset: 

Wiley
doi:10.1002/cre2.70032
URI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.70032
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2025082788387
Tiivistelmä

Background

This study evaluated the accuracy of the CBCT reconstruction model compared to the natural tooth and the accuracy of the replica tooth compared to the natural tooth.

Objective

The hypothesis was that a replica tooth could be used as a surgical guide in autotransplantation.

Methods

Three teeth were chosen and a CBCT reconstruction model was formed from each tooth. STL-data was transferred to a milling machine and replica teeth were milled from PEEK. A digitized surface model was prepared from the natural and the replica teeth by a stereophotogrammetry scanner. The surface model from the optical scan of the natural tooth was compared to the CBCT reconstruction model and the surface model of the replica tooth. The models were matched on each other, and surface-based rigid registration was performed between the surface models. Distances were calculated and visualized by MATLAB.

Results

The CBCT reconstruction model and the natural tooth were compared. The largest euclidean distance was found at the root tip in the premolar (0.93 mm) and at the furcation area in the molar (2.3 mm). When the natural tooth and the replica tooth were compared, the largest euclidean distance was found at the root tip in the premolar (1.5 mm) and at the furcation area in the molar (1.9 mm).

Conclusion

A CBCT scan maintains sufficient image quality for tooth autotransplantation planning. The replica tooth corresponded in size and shape to the natural tooth in terms of clinically expected need of precision.

Kokoelmat
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet [27094]

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Tämä kokoelma

JulkaisuajatTekijätNimekkeetAsiasanatTiedekuntaLaitosOppiaineYhteisöt ja kokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste