Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä aineisto 
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Forest fuel extraction does not affect macrolichens on deadwood substrates, but only if coarse woody debris is not collected

Purhonen, Jenna; Nirhamo, Aleksi; Jäntti, Mari; Halme, Panu

Forest fuel extraction does not affect macrolichens on deadwood substrates, but only if coarse woody debris is not collected

Purhonen, Jenna
Nirhamo, Aleksi
Jäntti, Mari
Halme, Panu
Katso/Avaa
s10342-024-01692-y.pdf (1.339Mb)
Lataukset: 

Springer
doi:10.1007/s10342-024-01692-y
URI
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10342-024-01692-y
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2025082788609
Tiivistelmä

The increasing use of forest fuels poses risks to biodiversity. Lichens that grow on deadwood may be affected as fuel extraction removes their substrates. We surveyed deadwood and macrolichens on deadwood in two types of clearcuts: sites in which forest fuels, stumps and slash, had been extracted, and standard clearcut sites, i.e. control sites with no fuel extraction. Extraction sites had 52% lower deadwood volume (44.3 m³/ha vs. 21.4 m³/ha) and 36% less deadwood surface area. However, the negative impact of fuel extraction on macrolichen species richness was low: 21.4 and 16.9 species on average were found in control and extraction sites, respectively. We found a clear positive relationship between macrolichen species richness and the surface area of logs, which are usually not targeted by forest fuel extraction. Species composition varied more among extraction sites than control sites and differed between all the studied deadwood types. Species of Cladonia were associated with stumps, while species in the family Parmeliaceae were associated with logs. Slash was of negligible importance to macrolichens. Stumps may hold value, particularly if large-sized deadwood is otherwise not available. Thus, we conclude that the extraction of slash poses no threat to macrolichen diversity, whereas extensive extraction of stumps can cause losses in lichen diversity. The loss of coarse woody debris during forest fuel extraction has negative effects on lichen diversity and should be avoided.

Kokoelmat
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet [27093]

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Tämä kokoelma

JulkaisuajatTekijätNimekkeetAsiasanatTiedekuntaLaitosOppiaineYhteisöt ja kokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste