Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä aineisto 
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Testing of additively manufactured aluminium material and cross-sections in compression

Zhang, Ruizhi; Amraei, Mohsen; Piili, Heidi; Gardner, Leroy

Testing of additively manufactured aluminium material and cross-sections in compression

Zhang, Ruizhi
Amraei, Mohsen
Piili, Heidi
Gardner, Leroy
Katso/Avaa
Testing of additively manufactured aluminium material and cross-sections in compression.pdf (10.69Mb)
Lataukset: 

Elsevier BV
doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120798
URI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120798
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe202601216504
Tiivistelmä

A comprehensive experimental investigation into the mechanical properties and structural performance of square hollow section (SHS) stub columns manufactured by laser beam powder bed fusion (PBF-LB/M) from AlSi10Mg aluminium alloy, has been conducted and is presented herein. A series of tensile and compressive coupons with different build directions, together with six SHS stub columns, were additively manufactured and tested. The PBF-LB/M AlSi10Mg material exhibited good mechanical performance and mild anisotropy, with yield and ultimate strengths of around 280 MPa and 420 MPa, respectively, and fracture strains of between about 4 % and 7 %. SHS profiles were examined to isolate the influence of the manufacturing process, enabling direct comparisons with the performance and design of conventionally produced cross-sections. The PBF-LB/M aluminium SHS stub columns failed by inelastic local buckling and exhibited similar performance to conventionally manufactured aluminium SHS in the slender range, while showing higher normalised load-carrying capacities in the stocky range. Comparisons with the existing design methods indicated that both Eurocode 9 (EC9) and the continuous strength method (CSM) can provide safe-sided resistance predictions, with the CSM yielding more accurate and consistent results.

Kokoelmat
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet [29337]

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Tämä kokoelma

JulkaisuajatTekijätNimekkeetAsiasanatTiedekuntaLaitosOppiaineYhteisöt ja kokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste