Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä aineisto 
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Treatment adherence in first-episode psychosis: A one-year follow-up study comparing self-reported adherence, pharmacy refill data, and therapeutic drug monitoring

Leijala, Juhani; Kampman, Olli; Gunnar, Teemu; Suvisaari, Jaana

Treatment adherence in first-episode psychosis: A one-year follow-up study comparing self-reported adherence, pharmacy refill data, and therapeutic drug monitoring

Leijala, Juhani
Kampman, Olli
Gunnar, Teemu
Suvisaari, Jaana
Katso/Avaa
1-s2.0-S0165178125004251-main.pdf (819.3Kb)
Lataukset: 

Elsevier BV
doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2025.116780
URI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2025.116780
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe202601215945
Tiivistelmä

Background

This study evaluates the accuracy of different adherence assessment methods in first-episode psychosis (FEP), where long-term adherence is essential for relapse prevention. We compared self-reported adherence, pharmacy refill data, and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM).

Methods

In this one-year follow-up study, 78 FEP patients were assessed for adherence at two and twelve months using the Attitudes towards Neuroleptic Treatment (ANT) scale (self-report), pharmacy refill data (≥1 or ≥2 purchases in four months), and TDM as the reference standard. Statistical analyses included McNemar’s test, sensitivity, specificity, Cohen’s kappa, and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis.

Results

At two months, adherence was 50.0% based on TDM, decreasing to 41.5% at twelve months. At two months, adherence rates were 73.3% for the ANT scale, 84.6% for at least one pharmacy refill, and 55.8% for at least two refills; by twelve months, these were 68.8%, 91.2%, and 52.9%, respectively. The ANT-attitude variable had weak predictive value for adherence (AUC: 0.607 at two months, 0.671 at twelve months). The ANT scale showed high sensitivity but low specificity, leading to adherence overestimation. Pharmacy refill adherence was more reliable, particularly when defined as at least two purchases within four months.

Conclusion

Medication non-adherence is common in FEP. Pharmacy refill data provided a more accurate adherence measure than self-report. Enhancing adherence requires psychoeducation, follow-up, and proactive monitoring. Measuring drug concentrations after hospital discharge could help detect early non-adherence and optimize treatment.

Kokoelmat
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet [29337]

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Tämä kokoelma

JulkaisuajatTekijätNimekkeetAsiasanatTiedekuntaLaitosOppiaineYhteisöt ja kokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste