Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä aineisto 
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Assessing forest structural complexity: insights from alternative laser scanning approaches

Cimdins, Reinis; Yrttimaa, Tuomas; Vastaranta, Mikko; Kankare, Ville

Assessing forest structural complexity: insights from alternative laser scanning approaches

Cimdins, Reinis
Yrttimaa, Tuomas
Vastaranta, Mikko
Kankare, Ville
Katso/Avaa
Assessing forest structural complexity insights from alternative laser scanning approaches.pdf (1.934Mb)
Lataukset: 

Informa UK Limited
doi:10.1080/02827581.2025.2553745
URI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2025.2553745
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe202601217164
Tiivistelmä

This study evaluates the potential of low-altitude airborne laser scanning (ALS) and terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) for characterizing structural complexity in Southern Finland. Unlike species diversity, structural complexity reflects realized niche occupancy by describing how vegetation utilizes light, water, and space, providing key insights into ecosystem functioning. We analyzed 99 circular sample plots (r = 20 m) scanned with helicopter-borne ALS at 80 m altitude and TLS data from nine scan locations per plot. Structural complexity metrics were derived at both grid level (variability in canopy height models and voxel occupancy) and object level (variability in individual tree attributes). High-density ALS effectively captured vertical and horizontal complexity through object-level analysis, showing close agreement with TLS. However, differences in measurement geometry affected volumetric complexity, with ALS and TLS characterizing tree architecture and vegetation occupancy differently. Object-level approaches captured a broader range of horizontal and vertical complexity, while grid-level approaches better captured volumetric variability, facilitating the identification of forest stand properties and biodiversity hotspots. The strongest agreement between ALS and TLS occurred for variation in tree height (R² = 0.66, Spearman = 0.80), while lowest agreement was found for fractal dimensions of tree architecture (R² = 0.04, Spearman = 0.25).

Kokoelmat
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet [29337]

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Tämä kokoelma

JulkaisuajatTekijätNimekkeetAsiasanatTiedekuntaLaitosOppiaineYhteisöt ja kokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste