Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä aineisto 
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Co‐Design in the Adaptation of a Clinical Decision Support System to Aid Violence Risk Assessment and Management: A Case Study

Anttila, Minna J.; Ameel, Maria K.; Rautiainen, Tinja; Anttila, Jenni; Maguire, Tessa; Daffern, Michael; Lantta, Tella

Co‐Design in the Adaptation of a Clinical Decision Support System to Aid Violence Risk Assessment and Management: A Case Study

Anttila, Minna J.
Ameel, Maria K.
Rautiainen, Tinja
Anttila, Jenni
Maguire, Tessa
Daffern, Michael
Lantta, Tella
Katso/Avaa
Psychiatric Ment Health Nurs - 2025 - Anttila - Co‐Design in the Adaptation of a Clinical Decision Support System to Aid.pdf (299.3Kb)
Lataukset: 

Wiley-Blackwell
doi:10.1111/jpm.70023
URI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.70023
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe202601217371
Tiivistelmä

Introduction

The electronic application of a clinical decision support system (CDSS) conjoining the Dynamic Appraisal of Situational Aggression and the Aggression Prevention Protocol has been shown to be effective in reducing coercion and workplace violence in forensic settings in Australia. However, there is currently a lack of knowledge on the successful implementation of CDSSs across different cultural environments.

Aim

To describe the use of co-design in the adaptation of a CDSS, the eDASA+APP-FI in Finland.

Method

This qualitative case study followed a co-design framework involving a variety of methods, including analysing project data, rapid ethnography, and analysing the notes from co-design workshops.

Results

The adaptation of the CDSS into the local context included changes to the training programme and in the frequency of use of the CDSS, as well as linguistic adjustment.

Discussion

The co-design framework was valuable in identifying adaptation needs and in providing a sense of ownership among staff and consumers.

Limitations

Co-design can be time-consuming in clinical environments.

Implications

The results emphasise the importance of co-design in the identification of adaptation needs as part of the implementation process of a CDSS.

Recommendations

Co-design can be used as a framework when aiming to create a feasible CDSS.

Kokoelmat
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet [29337]

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Tämä kokoelma

JulkaisuajatTekijätNimekkeetAsiasanatTiedekuntaLaitosOppiaineYhteisöt ja kokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste