Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä aineisto 
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Defining Critical Emergency Medicine (CrEM): A Delphi Study From Scandinavia

Bäckström, Denise; Tommila, Miretta; Pedersen, Mette; Lindner, Thomas; Kruse, Nanna; Larsen, Robert

Defining Critical Emergency Medicine (CrEM): A Delphi Study From Scandinavia

Bäckström, Denise
Tommila, Miretta
Pedersen, Mette
Lindner, Thomas
Kruse, Nanna
Larsen, Robert
Katso/Avaa
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand - 2025 - Bäckström - Defining Critical Emergency Medicine CrEM A Delphi Study From Scandinavia.pdf (684.7Kb)
Lataukset: 

Wiley
doi:10.1111/aas.70150
URI
https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.70150
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe202601216470
Tiivistelmä

Background

Critical emergency medicine (CrEM) is one of four subspecialty pillars within anesthesiology and intensive care medicine, as defined by the Scandinavian Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (SSAI). Despite its recognized clinical relevance, a comprehensive definition of CrEM has until now been lacking. The aim of this study was to establish a consensus-based definition of CrEM and delineate its core components, competencies, and operational domains.

Methods

A modified Delphi study was conducted among experts from the SSAI-CrEM education program. The process involved two iterative rounds followed by external validation with alumni from previous CrEM programs. Statements for evaluation were generated from participant essays and refined by a steering committee of experienced consultants. Consensus was defined as ≥ 90% agreement.

Results

Of 44 initial statements, 37 reached consensus and were organized into six thematic domains: (1) Core Function and Scope, (2) Competence and Training, (3) Work Environment and Challenges, (4) Interdisciplinary and Teamwork Approach, (5) Ethical and Decision-Making Responsibilities, and (6) Need for Research and Continuous Development. CrEM was defined as a physician-led, context-adapted subspecialty focusing on rapid stabilization, life-saving interventions, and high-acuity care across diverse clinical, and prehospital environments. The results emphasize the need for structured training, ethical competence, leadership in multidisciplinary teams, and ongoing scientific development.

Conclusion

CrEM constitutes a distinct and essential subspecialty within anesthesiology and intensive care medicine, bridging advanced emergency care across institutional boundaries. This study provides a structured definition and framework that may support curriculum development, clinical governance, and research initiatives within the field. Future work should aim to further validate these findings and guide the evolution of CrEM in both clinical and academic contexts.

Kokoelmat
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet [29335]

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Tämä kokoelma

JulkaisuajatTekijätNimekkeetAsiasanatTiedekuntaLaitosOppiaineYhteisöt ja kokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste