Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä aineisto 
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Local peoples’ values and disvalues in and around an Indian protected area undergoing urbanization

Plieninger, Tobias; Thapa, Pramila; Fagerholm, Nora; Basu, Sukanya; Bhaskar, Dhanya; Nagendra, Harini; Raymond, Christopher M.; Torralba, Mario

Local peoples’ values and disvalues in and around an Indian protected area undergoing urbanization

Plieninger, Tobias
Thapa, Pramila
Fagerholm, Nora
Basu, Sukanya
Bhaskar, Dhanya
Nagendra, Harini
Raymond, Christopher M.
Torralba, Mario
Katso/Avaa
local-peoples-values-and-disvalues-in-and-around-an-indian-protected-area-undergoing-urbanization.pdf (628.1Kb)
Lataukset: 

Cambridge University Press (CUP)
doi:10.1017/S0376892925100234
URI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0376892925100234
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe202601215807
Tiivistelmä

Urbanization has become a key pressure on many of the world’s protected areas. This study investigates how local communities perceive landscape values and disvalues in and around Bannerghatta National Park (near Bengaluru, India), which is experiencing high rates of urban development at its peripheries. Using combined free-listing and Public Participation Geographic Information Systems (PPGIS) mapping, we surveyed 489 residents from 12 villages to elicit both landscape values and disvalues. Respondents mapped values such as biodiversity, fertile land and clean air, while disvalues focused on human–wildlife conflicts. Despite persistent conflicts and urbanization pressures, residents valued the National Park for its multiple landscape values. Both values and disvalues were concentrated around village areas. We find that socio-demographic factors – especially caste, land ownership and work in agriculture – significantly influenced perceptions. Specifically, marginalized caste members and landless individuals reported more disvalues, while landowners and farmers noted more values. Our study emphasizes the need to consider both landscape values and disvalues for balanced decision-making in protected areas. It also highlights the potential of free-listing to identify the well-being aspects that matter most for people, which points to the importance of agricultural uses in and around protected areas undergoing urbanization.

Kokoelmat
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet [29337]

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Tämä kokoelma

JulkaisuajatTekijätNimekkeetAsiasanatTiedekuntaLaitosOppiaineYhteisöt ja kokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste