Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä aineisto 
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Use of digital technology in maxillofacial prosthetic treatment of cleft lip and palate in patients with severe periodontitis: A case report

Mouri, Yuki; Murase, Mai; Matsui, Satoshi; Wada, Junichiro; Wakabayashi, Noriyuki

Use of digital technology in maxillofacial prosthetic treatment of cleft lip and palate in patients with severe periodontitis: A case report

Mouri, Yuki
Murase, Mai
Matsui, Satoshi
Wada, Junichiro
Wakabayashi, Noriyuki
Katso/Avaa
advpub_JPR_D_25_00061.pdf (3.156Mb)
Lataukset: 

Japan Prosthodontic Society
doi:10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_25_00061
URI
https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.jpr_d_25_00061
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe202601215871
Tiivistelmä

Patients: A 56-year-old man with a left-sided cleft lip and palate was referred to our department due to mastication and speech difficulties. His existing prostheses have become unstable owing to changes in the remaining dentition over 10 years. For the fabrication of the new interim maxillofacial prostheses, a digital impression technique was selected as the conventional technique posed medical risks due to hypermobile teeth and maxillary defects. New interim maxillofacial prostheses were fabricated using a combination of the digital impression technique and a bite-seating impression, performed with trial prostheses and impression material. The patient has been using the new interim prostheses comfortably since delivery. The oral functional evaluation yielded favorable results.

Discussion: Patients with cleft lip and palate should use their existing maxillofacial prostheses during the fabrication of new ones, even if they are of suboptimal quality. Although addressing these issues using conventional techniques is challenging, digital technology provides a viable solution. However, impression material is essential for capturing mucosal defects and complex anatomy in cleft lip and palate cases; therefore, digital data should be supplemented by either well-adjusted existing prostheses or bite-seating impressions using impression material before new prostheses fabrication. Although his occlusal force was lower than the criterion for the oral hypofunction test, his masticatory performance remained favorable. Speech analysis revealed persistent air leakage; however, all scores improved with the prostheses.

Conclusions: Digital technology has enabled the safe fabrication of interim maxillofacial prostheses, resulting in improved masticatory and speech performance.

Kokoelmat
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet [29337]

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Tämä kokoelma

JulkaisuajatTekijätNimekkeetAsiasanatTiedekuntaLaitosOppiaineYhteisöt ja kokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste