Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • In English
  • Suomeksi
  • In English
  • Kirjaudu
Näytä aineisto 
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
  •   Etusivu
  • 3. UTUCris-artikkelit
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet
  • Näytä aineisto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

National policy responses to address loneliness: A global scoping review of 194 WHO member states

Goldman, Nina; Alemdar, Melek; Megges, Herlind; Matsumoto, Naka; Schoenmakers, Eric; van den Berg; Pauline; Lasgaard, Mathias; Christiansen, Julie; Junttila, Niina; Goldman, Andreas; Draxl, Debora; El-Osta, Austen; Qualter, Pamela

National policy responses to address loneliness: A global scoping review of 194 WHO member states

Goldman, Nina
Alemdar, Melek
Megges, Herlind
Matsumoto, Naka
Schoenmakers, Eric
van den Berg
Pauline
Lasgaard, Mathias
Christiansen, Julie
Junttila, Niina
Goldman, Andreas
Draxl, Debora
El-Osta, Austen
Qualter, Pamela
Katso/Avaa
1-s2.0-S0168851025003070-main.pdf (3.017Mb)
Lataukset: 

Elsevier
doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105553
URI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105553
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on:
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe202601279273
Tiivistelmä

Background

Loneliness is associated with adverse physical and mental health outcomes. It affects individuals across all age groups and geographical regions.

Objective

To characterise the extent that WHO Member States address loneliness, social isolation and social connection through national policies.

Methods

We searched government websites using key terms. A matrix was used to extract data, followed by in-depth document analysis.

Results

By February 2025, only eight WHO Member States (Denmark, UK (England, Scotland, Wales), Finland, Germany, Netherlands, Sweden, Japan, USA) had policies directly addressing loneliness, social isolation or social connection. Policymakers validated the findings. Common policy aims included building a more connected society, addressing loneliness as a wider societal challenge rather than just an individual issue, and supporting both individuals and organisations to manage loneliness. Key recommendations in these policies often highlighted the need to increase knowledge through research, raise public awareness to reduce stigma, promote cross-sectoral collaboration, integrate loneliness into government policy and implement community-based approaches. National policies emerged following societal activism, initiatives from government departments or a large-scale research project.

Conclusion

Various policies are in place to help address loneliness at the national level. To maximise impact, policies require adequate funding. To date, none of the national policies had undergone rigorous evaluation concerning their effectiveness. This review highlights the growing political focus on loneliness and provides a starting point for those seeking to understand, develop or strengthen national strategies to address loneliness, social isolation or social connection.

Kokoelmat
  • Rinnakkaistallenteet [29337]

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

 

Tämä kokoelma

JulkaisuajatTekijätNimekkeetAsiasanatTiedekuntaLaitosOppiaineYhteisöt ja kokoelmat

Omat tiedot

Kirjaudu sisäänRekisteröidy

Turun yliopiston kirjasto | Turun yliopisto
julkaisut@utu.fi | Tietosuoja | Saavutettavuusseloste