Typologies of Family Functioning and 24-h Movement Behaviors

dc.contributor.authorGuerrero Michelle D
dc.contributor.authorBarnes Joel D
dc.contributor.authorTremblay Mark S
dc.contributor.authorPulkki-Råback Laura
dc.contributor.organizationfi=lastenpsykiatrian tutkimuskeskus|en=Research Centre for Child Psychiatry|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.83706093164
dc.converis.publication-id53378856
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/53378856
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-28T14:41:46Z
dc.date.available2022-10-28T14:41:46Z
dc.description.abstractResearch on the importance of the family environment on children's health behaviors is ubiquitous, yet critical gaps in the literature exist. Many studies have focused on one family characteristic and have relied on variable-centered approaches as opposed to person-centered approaches (e.g., latent profile analysis). The purpose of the current study was to use latent profile analysis to identify family typologies characterized by parental acceptance, parental monitoring, and family conflict, and to examine whether such typologies are associated with the number of movement behavior recommendations (i.e., physical activity, screen time, and sleep) met by children. Data for this cross-sectional observational study were part of the baseline data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study. Data were collected across 21 study sites in the United States. Participants included 10,712 children (female = 5143, males = 5578) aged 9 and 10 years (M = 9.91, SD = 0.62). Results showed that children were meaningfully classified into one of five family typologies. Children from families with high acceptance, medium monitoring, and medium conflict (P2; OR = 0.54; 95% CI, 0.39-0.76); high acceptance, medium monitoring, and high conflict (P3; OR = 0.28; 95% CI, 0.20, 0.40); low acceptance, low monitoring, and medium conflict (P4; OR = 0.24; 95% CI, 0.16, 0.36); and medium acceptance, low monitoring, and high conflict (P5; OR = 0.19; 95% CI, 0.12-0.29) were less likely to meet all three movement behavior recommendations compared to children from families with high acceptance, high monitoring, and low conflict (P1). These findings highlight the importance of the family environment for promoting healthy movement behaviors among children.
dc.identifier.eissn1660-4601
dc.identifier.jour-issn1661-7827
dc.identifier.olddbid189734
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/172828
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/44813
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021042827597
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorPulkki-Råback, Laura
dc.okm.discipline3142 Public health care science, environmental and occupational healthen_GB
dc.okm.discipline3142 Kansanterveystiede, ympäristö ja työterveysfi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.publisher.countrySwitzerlanden_GB
dc.publisher.countrySveitsifi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeCH
dc.relation.articlenumberARTN 699
dc.relation.doi10.3390/ijerph18020699
dc.relation.ispartofjournalInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
dc.relation.issue2
dc.relation.volume18
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/172828
dc.titleTypologies of Family Functioning and 24-h Movement Behaviors
dc.year.issued2021

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
ijerph-18-00699 (1).pdf
Size:
567.42 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Publisher's PDF