Whistler Critical Mach Number Concept Revisited

dc.contributor.authorBalikhin, Michael A.
dc.contributor.authorAgapitov, Oleksiy V.
dc.contributor.authorKrasnoselskikh, Vladimir
dc.contributor.authorRoytershteyn, Vadim
dc.contributor.authorWalker, Simon N.
dc.contributor.authorGedalin, Michael
dc.contributor.authorJeba Raj
dc.contributor.authorImmanuel Christopher
dc.contributor.authorColomban, Lucas
dc.contributor.organizationfi=avaruustutkimuslaboratorio|en=Space Research Laboratory|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.47833719389
dc.converis.publication-id509013992
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/509013992
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-24T17:51:59Z
dc.description.abstract<p><br>The formation of a collisionless shock is the result of a balance between nonlinear steepening and processes that counteract this steepening. Dispersive shocks are shocks in which dispersive processes counterbalance the front steepening and are formed when the dispersive spatial scale exceeds scales associated with resistive processes. Oblique dispersive shocks are characterized by a phase standing wave precursor adjacent to the magnetic ramp. The whistler critical Mach number is defined as the maximum Mach number for which a linear whistler wave can phase stand upstream of the shock front. It was widely accepted that if the Mach number exceeds , linear whistler waves propagating along the shock normal are not able to "phase stand" in the upstream flow, and "& mldr;the shock will be initiated by a monotonic ramp." (Kennel et al., 1985, https://doi.org/10.1029/gm034p0001). In this study, we present results of numerical simulations and observations of shocks with that reveal the occurrence of an alternative scenario. For both the shock resulting from kinetic particle-in-cell simulations and that observed by MMS, the propagation direction of the precursor deviates from the shock normal direction. As a result, the velocity of the surface of constant phase along the shock normal exceeds the phase speed of these waves. It is shown that the propagation of the surface of constant phase along the shock normal occurs at a velocity that is nearly equal to the shock speed. Hence, these waves are "phase standing along the shock normal" in spite of .<br></p>
dc.identifier.eissn2169-9402
dc.identifier.jour-issn2169-9380
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/59106
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1029/2025ja034905
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2026022315585
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorJeba Raj, Immanuel
dc.okm.discipline115 Astronomy and space scienceen_GB
dc.okm.discipline115 Avaruustieteet ja tähtitiedefi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU)
dc.publisher.countryUnited Statesen_GB
dc.publisher.countryYhdysvallat (USA)fi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeUS
dc.relation.articlenumbere2025JA034905
dc.relation.doi10.1029/2025JA034905
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJournal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
dc.relation.issue1
dc.relation.volume131
dc.titleWhistler Critical Mach Number Concept Revisited
dc.year.issued2026

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
JGR Space Physics - 2026 - Balikhin - Whistler Critical Mach Number Concept Revisited.pdf
Size:
715.87 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format